50K Bond just posted Thursday Sept.4th,08 #2

  • Thread starter Thread starter CW
  • Start date Start date
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
She was not forbidden to use the internet and I don't recall anything about no contact with anyone under 17. The bond agreement I read, she had to stay at home, with the exceptions of visits to her lawyer and to go to church and those had to be prearranged.
Here is a link where her case manager and her are going to review the 10 pages of restrictions given to her before she left on home release.


http://www.wftv.com/news/17288138/detail.html

Now I am going to go see if I can find those stupid 10 pages. Surely in 10 pages of restrictions they can find enough to revoke her bond status!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brini View Post
Each of the two bondsmen who are splitting her bail will pay $25K. They will not get that back. If she runs, they will each have to pay another $225K.

[/B]

Talison's reply:
I'm sorry, but that is not correct. The bondsmen DO get the $50K back. If the defendant shows up in court, then the court does not keep any part of the bail money. It is all refunded to whoever paid it.


[/I]

Neither of these are correct.
The bondsmen does not pay anything to anyone, unless the person bonded does not show up in court. If that happens, yes, each bonding company would then pay the court $225K each.
The bondsmen does not get anything "back"..there's nothing to get back. . someone goes to the bail bondsmen, gives them $50K & collateral worth $500K. The bondsman takes that $50K straight to the bank, they don't actually pay the jail or court or anyone any amount of money; they simply "post the bond" by giving the jail officials a piece of paper, called a surety, which in essence says "If this person does not show up for court, we owe you $500K.
In this case the bonding companies are on the line for $225K each, and they pocketed $25K each, which was paid to them by anonymous, who by the way, does not get anything back except clear title to the collateral they put up.
(In this case, it's a bit more complicated because Von Waldner wrote a transfer bond for Miller Bonding, Miller Bonding got the $25K & paid Von Waldner a percentage for doing the paperwork here in Orange County for them.)
The premium is the bonding companies fee, how they make their money, for guaranteeing someone will show up for court. They pay a percentage of all the bonds they write to their insurance company/underwriters, who is the actual party who would have to fork over the $500K in the event the person bonded does not appear in court.
 
Does anyone know when she is getting out, or is she already out?

Well I guess it really is all about casey and not about Caylee anymore. So sad that someone doesn't think that Caylee deserves to have someone write a check for 50 grand to aid in searching for her or any of the other children out there still "missing".:(

It really baffles me when people do this sort of stuff, I can only imagine the calls baez will getting now..."Hey, you think you can get someone to bail me outta here", "only if you lie and tell really stupid stories about where your child is..then people will open their wallets for you". "O.K. Got it".

Someone somewhere is taking notes here and will expect the same sort of over the top coverage and financial considerations.
 
I am not sure, but I read somewhere that she has a 'casemanager' and that person can grant approval of where she can go and how long she can stay etc. I beleive this is the same person that she sees once a week when out on bail.
 
She could be released anywhere from this evening to sometime in the morning. I'm sure they will try hard to keep it from being closed.

AND WE THOUGHT THE SCOTT PETERSON CASE WAS A THREE RING CIRCUS!!!
 
The individual posting the bond prefers to remain anonymous, and is doing it because of the belief that Ms. Anthony's constitutional rights have been grossly violated. Mr. Baez will have no comment about the bond and will respect the privacy of the anonymous party.

http://www.wesh.com/news/17392699/detail.html

bla bla bla :banghead:

I'm only on page 2 of this thread, but wanted to put in my .02 (I usually try to read a thread through first, thank goodness I"m a speed reader, kind of)
Whoever put up bail has deep pockets and has a vested interest in Casey being out. Maybe "follow the money" would be in order here.
 
She will keep getting arrested on three new charges for each check she fraudulently used
 
This is a copy of the post found at http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69537
Thank you QuickAttack
1) She could not use any cellphone, that she must use landlines, and that her telephone conversations are limited to 5 minutes daily. (Can't find documentation of this--just recall it from a tv interview maybe?)
2) She is not to use any computer to access the internet. (Also foggy recollection from a tv interview? No documentation.)
3) No suggestive or tight clothes (at her meetings with her case manager? at home? in public?).
4) No alcohol or drugs - random pee tests anytime.
5) Must have permission from case manager to leave home for any reason, including to go to doctor, church, attorney's office.
6) Monitoring device required - must pay $5/day for monitoring, and cannot move outside a 150' radius of unit.
7) Home supervision? Must be supervised by a "Casey sitter?" (Cindy's words. *roll eyes*)
It would be great if we could clear up these conditions...can anyone help me find info on this?
--------
Now we know she broke the computer instruction.
It was also stated that she could have no contact with minors under 17, since she both with that 12 year old even suggesting sleep overs, I have no idea why the judge is even allowing her to be rereleased.
 
i think that the da has enought eviedence to bring the murder charge.. But is waiting to get the case airtight.... So when the clock starts ticking they are ready... I mean they must have even more damning evidence than what they have leaked... Cause i think the leaks were on purpose....

totally agree!
 
Here is a link where her case manager and her are going to review the 10 pages of restrictions given to her before she left on home release.


http://www.wftv.com/news/17288138/detail.html

Now I am going to go see if I can find those stupid 10 pages. Surely in 10 pages of restrictions they can find enough to revoke her bond status!

I have a link but also have dial up, so it would take me all night to load them. :doh:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1072043/Casey-Anthony-Released-from-Jail-on-500000-Bail
 
You know what's odd? We don't ever see any of the prosecutors on TV, not that they should be, but you would think they would do some talking without hurting there case right?
 
boogiebear - I wrote this down when I read the bond agreement:
(# 5, bullet 7) "cell phones and other phones that are not on the same line as the field monitoring device are exempt from these requirements." (emphasis mine)
 
has anyone said maybe the lawyer for the anthony's might have a hand in this? He did say he was not going to talk about finances but that people were going to be donating. I am going to find where I read that.


Eyewitness News asked Nejame if it would be a pro bono case and he would only say he did not want to talk about finances; however there would be some people contributing to the fund.

http://www.wftv.com/index.html
 
If the GP's thought they had problems before when KC was out on bail, I can only imagine what tomorrow brings. No mobile home in the front of the house, no body guard in the house and alot of angry people. It also doesnt help that CA is bashing the volunteers etc.
I am just speechless!/@$%*!!
 
CURRENT INMATE DATABASE
Bonding Out
Inmate Property
Jail Statistics
Sending Mail to Inmates
Victim Information and Notification Everyday
Video Visitation






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANTHONY, CASEY M

Booking Number: 08042346
Race: White
Gender: Female
Date of Birth: 03/19/1986
Last Known Address: 4937 Hopespring Dr, Orlando, Fl 32829

Cell: F-DORML-12
Date Booked: 08/30/2008
Time Booked: 12:03am
Number of Holds: HOME CONFINEMENT
undisclosed - 001
Notes: BOND PENDING


Charges
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
280
Total visitors
417

Forum statistics

Threads
609,693
Messages
18,256,853
Members
234,724
Latest member
Andhow5
Back
Top