Well if it was ex parte how did Journal and Courier know this? Who squealed? BBMNot all of us are just concerned about the D's behavior; if the judge stands on her orders, Nick may have a problem, too. Note that she states motions.
A lot of us are concerned about the entire trial and all the families and friends who are affected.
Delphi murder suspect files motion to use public funds to hire a private investigator
Attorneys for Richard Allen, the Delphi murders suspect, either has hired a private investigator or will hire one soon.www.jconline.com
The defense lawyers fed SM the whole shebang. They acknowledged it already. They emailed youtuber BW discovery and strategies...oh, by mistake...of course. The also let a not-offical-anymore employee into their offices who swiped images of the murder scene photos...oh, not intentionally...of course.OH,I don’t think they are bringing them in JUST in defence of the D. It might just tell us who’s been feeding them (the podcasters) long before the Westerman leak. JMHO
Well if it was ex parte how did Journal and Courier know this? Who squealed? BBM
Below is from your link
"Allen's attorneys filed an ex parte motion Wednesday for authorization to receive public funds to hire a private investigator to look into the allegations that Allen killed Libby German and Abby Williams on Feb. 13, 2017."
12/21/2022 | Motion Filed Ex Parte Motion Authorizing Funding for Fact Investigator Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Stamp: 12/21/2022 |
I’m sorry, I’m just not buying your view that the defence are the only baddies in this three ring circus. Could they have done better. Yes. But I doubt AB texted MW, “hey Mitch, I’m in my office on the phone but the war room is open and I’ve left all the good stuff out there for you. Take some pics, will ya, make sure you send them to RF so he can forward them to MRC. Need to get that stuff out asap to the podcasters.”The defense lawyers fed SM the whole shebang. They acknowledged it already. They emailed youtuber BW discovery and strategies...oh, by mistake...of course. The also let a not-offical-anymore employee into their offices who swiped images of the murder scene photos...oh, not intentionally...of course.
I wonder if this part was done correctly by the attorneys. They'd be the ones creating a legend, and labeling it with the bolded below, wouldn't they?Strictly in regards to NMcL's ex parte motion, here is what JG wrote in her 12/12/22 order (BBM):
All such motions shall bear the following legend, preceding and separated from the style of the motion: EX PARTE PLEADING T0 BE PLACED UNDER SEAL and the Clerk shall ensure that these filings are not accessible by the Prosecutor.
The Clerk, the Sheriff and any deputies from his office, the Court Reporter, and the Carroll
County Public Defender Agency and any agents are hereby restrained under penalty of contempt from disclosing to anyone the nature of any motion or order relating thereto, any testimony or colloquy adduced at any hearing on such motions, the text of any transcript, or any other information disclosed in such proceedings.
12/12/22: OrderGrantingExParteMotionforFundsIssued 10.pdf
IMOO, the Clerk (not the D) was supposed to assure these were filed as sealed and not accessible to NMcL. And, by disclosing the name of the D's requested expert in a public motion, NMcL opened himself up for contempt. JMO, but this issue should be treated as a separate entity from anything the D has done, and it's clear in JG's own order what has to happen for both the Clerk and NMcL. JMO.
So it's not the fact that they asked to use funds to hire a PI that's ex parte, it's what that a PI will be investigating the murders? Or did they name the PI and that's the big secret they needed to keep from the prosecutor?It is in the public case summary.
12/21/2022 Motion Filed
Ex Parte Motion Authorizing Funding for Fact Investigator
Filed By:
Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
12/21/2022
My question answered here. Jury will be sequestered. (In Lafayette?)
This is outrageous!
I wouldn’t count on it. Things seem to get recorded over, especially anything that would work in RA’s favour, but hey, honest mistake, right? Would you implicitly trust this place if it were your relative in there, accused of a murder he/she may not have committed? I sure wouldn’t. RA has not been convicted and his treatment has been less than fair, IMO.
Aren't the same categories of individuals defending the behavior of the state?Yes, it is a slap in the face to our Justice system that Internet Trolls, Podcasters and SM wannabes are going to be called in defense of the Defense. But kind of fitting when you think about it.
moo
I’m sorry, I’m just not buying your view that the defence are the only baddies in this three ring circus. Could they have done better. Yes. But I doubt AB texted MW, “hey Mitch, I’m in my office on the phone but the war room is open and I’ve left all the good stuff out there for you. Take some pics, will ya, make sure you send them to RF so he can forward them to MRC. Need to get that stuff out asap to the podcasters.”
JMO
Yes, it is a slap in the face to our Justice system that Internet Trolls, Podcasters and SM wannabes are going to be called in defense of the Defense. But kind of fitting when you think about it.
moo
After hearing from just these few SM people (and there may be more) and don't forget BW, who was real angry (ha) at AB for sending him that loaded email, I don't believe a word that comes from this defense team, as far as all these leaks being unintentional. It seems more than the wrong "Brad" was in the defense's contacts. I'm just sorry all this didn't play out before the SC stuff. Where's all the 3rd party high-powered defense advocates now, running to AB & BR's defense of these contempt charges?I’m sorry, I’m just not buying your view that the defence are the only baddies in this three ring circus. Could they have done better. Yes. But I doubt AB texted MW, “hey Mitch, I’m in my office on the phone but the war room is open and I’ve left all the good stuff out there for you. Take some pics, will ya, make sure you send them to RF so he can forward them to MRC. Need to get that stuff out asap to the podcasters.”
JMO
No, it's two that made contact to the Prosecution telling of having received highly confidential information and gruesome CS photos, which they chose not to share and discuss for clicks and likes. Good on them, I find it all appalling.Aren't the same categories of individuals defending the behavior of the state?
By no stretch of the imagination would I label these youtubers journalists. Why would the D look to use these SM people? Well to do exactly what they've done, leak sealed information and influence the public/jury pool. This is the most atrocious defense attorney behavior I've ever seen. I wonder with all these new testimonials/evidence coming out about the deplorable actions of RA's defense attorneys, if the SC won't have to revisit their disqualification.Perhaps we'll learn Hennessey's actual strategy at the hearing. My perspective?
These trolls are more Hennessey's offense, than his defense.
And it's working already, IMO
With hindsight, and with the SCOIN's written opinion, we understand that McL and Gull miscalculated both the source of the leak and the actual damage. Judge Gull's over-reaction and removal of the D denied RA his chosen counsel destroyed RA's speedy trial momentum and resulted in the SCOIN restoring RA's due process rights.
How did that happen? Well, they got trolled. All that damage ... because of one Westerman and two selfish, misguided self-involved suffering trolls high on reddit/discord/facebook induced serotonin.
If nothing else, Judge Gull has learned what a social media troll is. She won't let them get under her skin and blind her judgement the next time. And that's good - because here they are again.
Today Judge Gull received personal letters from two more trolls, explaining how, in support of her and the Prosecution and the Judge, they set a plan to entrap the defense, so McLeland can catch them, and Gull can know how evil the defense are and get rid of the D team once and for all.
And C'mon. After all this Court has been through? To have trolls on her desk and on her docket because they're fans of McLeland? And because they actually believe that Gull is on McLeland's SIDE? That it's Gull and McL against the Defense? And these are content creators with audiences?
Quick digression: The Defense just argued the public perception of bias and asked her to recuse. But Gull denied this was the case. Now there's proof of the public perception of bias on her record - thanks to Fig and Frank - right on her docket, in the record of this trial. There's a Hennessey win for the defense already.
I trust that given Hennessey's listed these clowns and their adventures on his exhibit list - the Court and all its officers will confront this info - that has found it's way into the court record - all the wiser. For the better of this trial, and future trials.
When one thinks about the Defense in any high profile trial getting a theory out to the public - they're getting their story out to the legitimate press. Why would they look to publish via the Fig and Frank crank show from the basement, when the press is happy to report their filings? It's kinda a hoot that these trolls believed they'd scoop the legit press on these (non-existent) Defense leaks.
The long-discredited fantasy that Baldwin sought out reddit trolls as a conduit for publicity was dissolved on the steps of the SCOIN. I bet even Gull is tired of hearing about it.
After all, Baldwin didn't say "Trolls - do your job!" He said "Journalists - do your job!"
JMHO
Yes, she's making a record. Every motion, every order, etc is (supposed to be) entered into the CCS."She's" making a record? Last I looked it's two male lead defense lawyers and one male lead defense lawyer's defense lawyer making quite the record...and there's really no counting on it. AJMO
Youtuber Anthony Greeno - a youtuber named in the Contempt Hearing exhibit list submitted by the Defense.
View attachment 489922
View attachment 489923
View attachment 489924
View attachment 489925