FrostedGlass
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Messages
- 6,381
- Reaction score
- 30,503
I don't know about that but this is listed in the D motion to compel:State’s Response to 3rd Franks Motion
The defense was made aware of the geofence experts and looks like they chose to write a Franks instead. The State calls out they have had this evidence from 1st discovery disclosure & once they were reinstated.
Pg 3:
View attachment 499315
Provided in spreadsheet form pg 4:
View attachment 499317
Going back to the State's Response on 3/17. They addressed the late discovery.
Adobe Acrobat
a. On November 4, 2019, the State of Indiana sent a geofence warrant to Google requesting activity from any device in a specified distance and within a specified time of the area in which the bodies of A.W. and L.G. were located. On the same day, it appears Google returned data in a spreadsheet which contains 18,632 lines of data, each relating to a particular device ID. Generally, there is information received in follow up requests which identify subscriber data with device IDs. To date, no such spreadsheet or data has been located by the defense nor can any such information be found by the defense in spite of requests to the prosecution.
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com