margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,165
Not OP but, a belief held without proof. Hypothesis.
I suppose you’re right…
Not OP but, a belief held without proof. Hypothesis.
Thanks! I have been trying to pin this down for a while.I don’t have it handy, but iirc it was only a day or two post murders. I’ll try to locate that, but I’m sure another member will beat me to it!
Still looking. Remarkably, that whole thing is covered in the FM on pgs 130, 131 but there’s no specific date of the interview at the grocery store.Thanks! I have been trying to pin this down for a while.
Not OP but, a belief held without proof. Hypothesis.
Brian Kohberger just so happens to have a vegan frying pan he no longer needs.If this goes to trial in three weeks, I will eat a vegan frying pan.
Predictiom: AT is on the cusp of an 11th hour motion for continuance, "on account of the "needless" delay caused by the State's objection to their phone surveys, which shell claim put them unfairly behind schedule.
JMO
Funny how these cases are one and the same. Nothingburger alibis and gaslighting from the defense. Oh and innocent BK and RA behind bars as a massive coverup.Brian Kohberger just so happens to have a vegan frying pan he no longer needs.
I contrast them as night and day. The killings took place on November 13, BK was behind bars on December 30. I know BK belongs where he is and I know why. That case was deftly investigated and looks to be very solid to me. Go PFunny how these cases are one and the same. Nothingburger alibis and gaslighting from the defense. Oh and innocent BK and RA behind bars as a massive coverup.
I have a question for you.Just 19 more days, trial is closing in rapidly. Almost home.
We might need to take up a collection for our legal advice.I have a question for you.
We might need to take up a collection for our legal advice.
I have another question that has been bugging me for weeks: Is it normal that the state hasn't announced that they are seeking the DP yet? I know, define normal.
Indiana Criminal Rules of Procedure Rule 1.1 specifies that civ pro rules govern when crim pro rules don't cover the issue:I have a question for you.
If the defense were to request a continuance, how late can they file that? Or maybe not late, but how close to the trial date can we get before we don't worry with a continuance request?
If a continuance is requested for some reason,
I've itemized by research and labor costs. $235 an hour average for my jurisdiction. The bill is on the way! Agreed?We might need to take up a collection for our legal advice.
I have another question that has been bugging me for weeks: Is it normal that the state hasn't announced that they are seeking the DP yet? I know, define normal.
I honestly don’t think they’ll go for the DP in this case. What was needed after 5 1/2 long years of word salad and nothing to show for it was a scapegoat, not a sacrifice. JMOWe might need to take up a collection for our legal advice.
I have another question that has been bugging me for weeks: Is it normal that the state hasn't announced that they are seeking the DP yet? I know, define normal.
OuchI honestly don’t think they’ll go for the DP in this case. What was needed after 5 1/2 long years of word salad and nothing to show for it was a scapegoat, not a sacrifice. JMO
Just 19 more days, trial is closing in rapidly. Almost home.
Oh I know you aren't blaming the D. It was just my way to try to have some empathy for them . I share your sentiments on this D team. I wish RA had better defense attorneys. Look at the attorney for Kohberger case. She doesn't engage in the conspiracy theories of youtubers, podcasters, redditers, etc (tunnels under house, etc) and she is respectful.It's not blaming the Defense for not being ready, what I do blame them for is lying and stating they were ready to go straight to trial, even on the Jan date. Then filing a MST when they knew, by their own admission of having not reviewed all the Discovery, they still weren't ready.
Some could argue strategy, I say deceitfulness that has come back to bite them hard. They referenced in this latest Motion coming across a document they found after they had to go through 'every page of the file'. Ummm, yes, that is what you do. You review every scrap of paper from Discovery front to back. With a combined 70 years of legal experience that shouldn't be news to R&B.
JMO