Well, huh. Color me underwhelmed by all of it!
I believe RA will be found guilty. IMO there are too many circumstantial things that the D failed to contradict. I personally believe about 90% that he's guilty. I wouldn't be a good juror, but I'd never be there because I (think I) know too many other things!
- D offered no RA alibi after he left the bridge (whichever time he left the bridge), although I understand they were trying to distance him entirely after the morning. But if he left the bridge at 1:30 or 2:15 and went bowling, or napping, or to the grocery store, we should have heard that. And what did he do that evening? We've never heard a thing about it, as far as I know. I think the jury will have a hard time with this.
- Sounds like KA never testified. And wouldn't have answered the questions I had anyway. IMO She'd have given him an evening alibi maybe?
- The sister and daughter's testimony was underwhelming (I feel bad that either of them had to be there to begin with!). The D would never have put them on the stand if those allegations were true. I am curious though if there's any merit to the "Kevin and ..." (was it Chris?) admissions. Can someone please remind me, after or during the three-day hearings, there were some closed hearings? I HAVE NO IDEA if anything like this was talked about, but I could see it being argued that any previous allegations couldn't be mentioned during trial because it could influence the jury. Those testimonies seemed very...controlled. (IMO)
- Maybe I watch too much TV!
- Literally CANNOT BELIEVE there was no digital evidence directly linking RA to the crime or to the location! This is bad on both sides, IMO. RA claimed to be on his phone checking stock, but no digital evidence to confirm. RA claimed to be on the bridge at (varying/contested) times, but no digital evidence to confirm any time at all! What happened to the geofence or CAST data (I honestly don't know which does what, sorry). The Google searches were meaningless IMO, but why didn't they say what sites were visited after the searches? I google all sorts of crazy things, sometimes I just scroll thru the results, but wouldn't someone be interested on sites I actually clicked thru to? And apparently no other online grossness found? No link to a_shots?? I am so very surprised, I felt sure there would be something here. I was wrong!!
- I find it suspicious that his 2017 phone wasn't found, amongst all the numerous devices found. I would have liked more info on the other devices re: when they were in use.
- Libby's phone

IMO it is common sense to most people that use cell phones that they misbehave at times. No way did a headphone jack get plugged in and removed. Geez. And even if it did, what is the experts opinion as to what went on during those hours the headphone jack was plugged in? The phone itself didn't move.
- Also CANNOT BELIEVE no trophies, no blood evidence in car was found. I was wrong! Again!
- I'm confused about some wanting to completely discredit Dr. Wala's testimony for following true crime...umm...aren't we all here? I'm a professional person with a career, and there are lawyers, counselors, many other professionals on this site and others. Following true crime or even a specific crime doesn't make us suddenly want to compromise our ethics and responsibilities. Any one of us could suddenly be thrust into a crime situation as a witness or as a professional. If we felt we would compromise the case, wouldn't we say so and remove ourselves? And if we felt it wouldn't, then we would proceed? And we would tell whoever needs to be told and let them decide? We're not children, and neither is she. I don't believe she "fed" RA any details. All JMO
- I fully believe that BG is the killer. The video/stills of BG don't rule RA out. And no witness saw any other person that we know of or saw two men that looked alike/dressed similarly. Or even saw two men that I know of! Is BG = RA...? I'm about 90%
- I'm sorry but I don't think RA was mistreated in custody (although if we were allowed to see the videos I could change my mind). Maybe he shouldn't have been in prison while awaiting trial, I agree. But if he'd have committed suicide or been killed or badly hurt while in county jail, we'd all be yammering on about that mistreatment. He was suicidal, and apparently didn't follow orders at times, and at other times psychotic. He was probably held in the best place they could (as opposed to a mental hospital?? I guess I don't know if one was available). And I don't think he went through potentially thousands of documents and info in the matter of a few days in order to make his confessions, one of which contained a very important detail IMO, when his own attorneys couldn't get through this discovery in a matter of many months. I don't think his psychosis made him confess. The van information is compelling, IMO.
- I do wish the ME was more certain in his assessment that a box cutter "could have" made the wounds, and went about releasing the info in the right way. Dangit.
- I wish they would have found the box cutter.
These days I think we all want to see DNA and a video or two of someone committing a crime. But I remember that Scott Peterson was convicted on circumstantial evidence, no direct evidence, no DNA, no evidence at all that his wife was murdered in their home. But I believe that he did it too. And Barry Morphew definitely did, IMO, LOL. (not sure if this last paragraph here is appropriate...)
Kind of a rant and brain-dumping! Thanks to everyone for your knowledge of this case!! I am OVERwhelmed by the intelligence and attentiveness of this forum.
EBM: Whoooweee! I didn't think the post would be so long! I had a lot built up lol