Motta says he invited MS very politely by email, but he didn’t hear back—then says that they ambushed him when he first appeared on there…
"MS was very critical of me, CW and Ausbrook and a couple of my friends. "
“Tonight Nothing is off the table” BM says….[then they promptly take the jury tampering accusations off the table]
“BM: The Bigger issue is which is really fascinating…—as seen in Karen Read and in Delphi,…” [then Motta trails off and never finishes the statement…]
“Here are the ground rules”…then once again he starts rambling without finishing his thought….
BM :“Should I apologise for telling Kevin to comb his hair and put a clean shirt on before he goes on court tv…I’ll say it to your face…I plan to show up in Delphi, Kevin, if that was your wish,[MS] to get me banned, we’ll see if that works for ya”…
BM:We desperately tried to get Cara on but she had other stuff going on…she gave me bullet points to address later…
We Want to bring on Michael Ausbrook, one of our Cabal…
BM: Here are the issues we want to address, 3 main ones, ...
but first we are going to take a step back from the jury tampering accusations made by MS….we are going to let Michael handle that that because he has a current Indiana law license , we don’t…
25 tweets done last night by Michael to address this tampering accusation…MA says " maybe you can link them here?"
[but I looked and didnt see that BM did link them...]
Ali asked MA and BM—"Have the defense lawyers ever asked you to do anything or say anything on social media for them? "
ALI:" Bob, other than being asked to stand behind a conversation being had in a courtroom that MS then misreported, or talking about concern about how Hennessy was feeling after receiving an email from them,
has the DT ever asked you to do anything or say anything or entice u to speak a certain way for them on social medias?
BM: "NO, absolutely not, inequitably no, I know nothing about any the evidence of the case, when I say nothing I mean nothing…I’ve never asked, bob continues , I mean “Do I communicate with Brad and Andy, obviously yes, in terms of strategy we’ve communicated with Brad and Andy, in what motions to file— how do they get back on the case..."
[OK< IF YOU KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT ANY EVIDENCE IN THE CASE HOW CAN YOU STRATEGISE AND DISCUSS WHICH MOTIONS TO FILE?]
"...we are criminal defense attorneys .not investigative journalists,
We are a podcast, not YouTubers, they obviously never have listened to any of our content ever…[then he goes on and on about his stellar podcast career]
Then he goes on and on about Ali’s beef with judges in prior cases, etc…and being accused of violating a court order in Nebraska, and in Iowa, etc…and then now in Delphi…"we have nothing to hide" [not sure why they are even discussing this—not a good look ]
ALI: Ok, to Michael, Outside of doing actual legal work, legal motions legal research, have u been asked to set forth a narrative of any kind by the DT, and Have you see any discovery?
AM: "No, and
No-one from actual DT has asked me to do anything like that and I turned down any offers of seeing discovery…I was offered the full video of BG in exchange for a full NDA and I said No thanks…"
OKAY, SO MA SWEARS HE HAS NO CONNECTION TO THE DT—but why is Ali saying ‘besides doing actual legal research and legal motions….ISN’T THAT A CONNECTION TO THE DT?
Also, who offered him the full video of BG on the bridge? The Defense?