Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #189

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tricia

Manager Websleuths.com
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Messages
29,777
Reaction score
47,662
Welcome back to the Delphi Murders discussion thread.

On the afternoon of Feb. 13th, 2017, best friends Abigail Williams and Liberty German were dropped off at a bridge in the town of Delphi. On Feb 14th their bodies were discovered around noon about 50 feet from the north bank of Deer Creek which is about 0.5 miles from the bridge.

Richard Allen has been arrested and charged with the murders of Abby and Libby
ISP page dedicated to the investigation (includes audio of suspect)

FOR MORE CLICK HERE FOR THE CARROL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FACEBOOK PAGE.

Anyone with information about this case, no matter how insignificant, is encouraged to call the Delphi Homicide Investigation Tip Line at
(844) 459-5786.

Information can also be reported by calling the Indiana State Police at(800) 382-7537, or the Carroll County Sheriff's Department at (765) 564-2413.

Information can also be emailed to Abbyandlibbytip@cacoshrf.com


PICTURES OF ABBY AND LIBBY

Link to post with all threads 1 - 98 (Courtesy of margarita25)
Thread #99 Thread #100 Thread #101 Thread #102 Thread #103 Thread #104 Thread #105 Thread #106 Thread #107 Thread #108 Thread #109 Thread #110 Thread #111 Thread #112 Thread #113 Thread #114Thread #115 Thread #116 Thread #117 Thread #118 Thread #119 Thread #120 Thread #121 Thread #122 Thread #123
Thread #124 Thread #125 Thread #126 Thread #127 Thread #128 Thread #129 Thread #130 Thread #131 Thread #132 Thread #133 Thread #134 Thread #135 Thread #136 Thread #137 Thread #138 Thread #139 Thread #140 Thread #141 Thread #142 Thread #143 Thread #144 Thread #145 Thread #146 Thread #147 Thread #148 Thread #149 Thread #150 Thread #151 Thread 152 Thread #153 Thread #154 Thread #155 Thread #156 Thread #157 Thread #158 Thread #159 Thread #160 Thread #161 Thread #162 thread #163 Thread #164 Thread #165 Thread #166 Thread #167 Thread #168 Thread #169 Thread #170 Thread #171 Thread #172 Thread #173 Thread # 174 Thread #175. Thread #176 Thread #177 Thread #178 Thread #179 Thread #180 Thread #181 Thread #182 Thread #183 Thread #184 Thread #185 Thread #186 Thread #187 Thread #188

Link to Media Maps & Timelines *No Discussion*
Link to Media Maps & Timelines #2 *No Discussion*
IMAGE Discussion Thread

Scanner Thread

Rules Etiquette & Information


Case map by skibaboo updated with grayhuze crime flow video

Grayhuze youtube channel
Murder sheet YouTube

Verified Insiders: None in this case at this time. Verified Professional, Member michael.gartley, is a Verified Expert in Imaging Science.

RULES OF THIS DISCUSSION

DO NOT post photos of random individuals (including persons featured in MSM articles about other area crimes) to compare to the images of unidentified suspect on the bridge.

PLEASE DO NOT POST PICTURES OF SEX OFFENDERS!

Do not sleuth family, PERIOD. This includes previous public records which have nothing to do with this case. They are victims here. Plain and simple.

If you feel you have a tip, by all means, phone it in. Do NOT discuss your tip here. Contact the authorities and give them time to follow your lead.

NOTE - per Tricia and Sillybilly’s 5.28.2021 post here, JBC as a poi is now open for discussion in the Delphi thread.


Added 12/12/21

For general discussion on KAK’s current case please use his thread.
IN, Peru - Kegan Anthony Kline, 27, arrested Aug 29, 2020, 30 Counts associated with CSAM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A consolidation of ADMIN & MOD notes (edited November 24, 2022):

- Members are allowed to discuss Richard Allen's voice as heard on the Gray Hughes podcast. Members may NOT link directly to RA's wife’s social media accounts.

- Speculation about RA’s possible involvement in other cases belongs in the OTHER CASES thread.


- Speculation that is not based on known fact is not allowed.

- Please use initials only for anyone other than victims or perps.

- If you have questions about rules or moderation, please do not ask them on the thread. Just jump off any post to use the Report feature to ask and a Mod or Admin will respond as soon as possible.

- Rumors are not allowed. If you can't link information to Websleuths approved sources, do NOT post it with "I read it somewhere" or "I'll find the link later ...".


- Sleuthing or discussing RSOs just because they are on the registry is not allowed. A thread specific exception may be made by Tricia or an Admin depending on geographical location in relation a crime.

- Photo alterations or side-by-side comparisons of unrelated pictures are not allowed.
 
ADMIN NOTE:

Sorry folks, but statement analysis, body language analysis, amateur handwriting analysis is not allowed unless sourced to a credentialed, forensic specialist involved in the case under discussion.

This discussion is dedicated to Abby and Libby. Posts that do not relate directly to their case are off topic and such posts get removed. If you wish to discuss personal matters, please do so with your WS friends through PM or in the basement.

Also, the presumption of innocence is part and parcel of the judicial process. It does not apply to the general public who are entitled to express their opinion. Members are not here to be lectured or chastised by others for expressing their personal opinions. If you have an issue, use the Report feature and let Mods or Admins determine what is or is not okay to post.

Thanks.

Sillybilly
WS Administrator

Click here for The Rules
 
Justice for Libby and Abby
 
Justice for Libby and Abby
Looking at those pictures make me want to cry.

So much to look forward to. So much to live for.

Two vibrant beautiful girls whose lives were snuffed out by evil.

There are no words to really express my feelings.

Justice is coming.

MOO
 
I am curious to hear what the DT will try and focus on in the upcoming hearing. The court will be ruling upon which things will be allowed and which will be suppressed. I can't wait to see how that all shakes out.

Best case scenario, they make some headway and we can keep moving forward.

Worse case scenario, the DT asks for some kind of higher court decision in response to something they disagree with...
 
I am still struggling with the D's latest Franks response.

I get they may want to run this clash of experts about phone pings at trial

But i just don't get how it is relevant to Franks. It's clear the prosecution absolutely believe these are not actual pings from Libbys phone. So why would they have put this alternate theory in the PCA? They are not lying or covering anything up.

It would not be practical if any possible defence theory had to be included in a search warrant PCA?

It feels like the same old public signalling, dressed up as a filing with no chance of success. But now written in a more level headed way.

MOO
 
I am still struggling with the D's latest Franks response.

I get they may want to run this clash of experts about phone pings at trial

But i just don't get how it is relevant to Franks. It's clear the prosecution absolutely believe these are not actual pings from Libbys phone. So why would they have put this alternate theory in the PCA? They are not lying or covering anything up.

It would not be practical if any possible defence theory had to be included in a search warrant PCA?

It feels like the same old public signalling, dressed up as a filing with no chance of success. But now written in a more level headed way.

MOO
The PCA wouldn't need to include the pings, nor any electronic data because RA put himself there at the time and place of the abduction and murders. What was included was concise and enough probable cause to convince a judge to sign a warrant. MO
 
Precious victims..1721898205660.png

Two years after Delphi's Abby Williams and Libby German were murdered, their families set up photos and candles for a Community prayer remembrance at Delphi United Methodist Church 1796 US-421, on Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2019.
Photo Provided By The Helmuth Family
 
Hearing time is getting close, I hope beyond hope it goes well, and after the Judge rules on the Motions, the Defense can stop with their deflection tactics and get their case and RA ready to go to trial.

It's beyond time, Abby & Libby deserve justice as do their families and the community of Delphi.

MOO
 
From the previous thread, TTF14 wrote this:
I don't think the point is to get what was found in the search warrant thrown out. The goal is to get the whole case dismissed because the search warrant was obtained illegally, is how I understand it. So of course they are going to keep trying.....their client is in prison and wants out. It's not about an item, it's about a whole life.

IMO MOO

The thing is that the only purpose of a Franks hearing is specifically to get a search warrant thrown out. That’s it. It’s essentially a backup mechanism if a judge refuses to hold a suppression hearing and a two-pronged test is used. The bar for obtaining this hearing is pretty high. If the test is passed, a hearing is held. If the hearing shows the affidavit was improperly written, the warrant is suppressed.

It’s not a motion for dismissal. Suppressing the warrant also doesn’t mean the case gets dismissed. If what some here claim is true and there is no real evidence, then the search warrant getting thrown out will have a negligible impact on the case anyway. Hence the idea is there must have been something pretty detrimental to the defense found at the house for them to have spent almost a year now filing repetitive franks motions trying to get the warrant thrown out.

 
From the previous thread, TTF14 wrote this:


The thing is that the only purpose of a Franks hearing is specifically to get a search warrant thrown out. That’s it. It’s essentially a backup mechanism if a judge refuses to hold a suppression hearing and a two-pronged test is used. The bar for obtaining this hearing is pretty high. If the test is passed, a hearing is held. If the hearing shows the affidavit was improperly written, the warrant is suppressed.

It’s not a motion for dismissal. Suppressing the warrant also doesn’t mean the case gets dismissed. If what some here claim is true and there is no real evidence, then the search warrant getting thrown out will have a negligible impact on the case anyway. Hence the idea is there must have been something pretty detrimental to the defense found at the house for them to have spent almost a year now filing repetitive franks motions trying to get the warrant thrown out.

Honest question - if a D team find strong exculpatory evidence, let’s say an unbreakable alibi, as they conduct their own investigation, what would the process be to raise this? Bring to police? DPP? Court? Would this move quickly?
 
I am still struggling with the D's latest Franks response.

I get they may want to run this clash of experts about phone pings at trial

But i just don't get how it is relevant to Franks. It's clear the prosecution absolutely believe these are not actual pings from Libbys phone. So why would they have put this alternate theory in the PCA? They are not lying or covering anything up.

It would not be practical if any possible defence theory had to be included in a search warrant PCA?

It feels like the same old public signalling, dressed up as a filing with no chance of success. But now written in a more level headed way.

MOO
I don’t find the latest Frank’s response with ping references having much, if any, relevance to the search warrant PCA.

RA is charged with murder on 2/13/17. He is accused of being on the bridge and ordering the girls down the hill to their deaths by murder.

Doesn’t matter if Libby’s phone was still pinging in the wee hours of 2/14. Libby and Abby were marched to their deaths after 2:07 pm and likely deceased by 3:30. RA placed himself there. Witnesses saw him. That’s plenty for probable cause. Testing then showed that the unspent bullet had been cycled through his gun.

Murder 1 and 2.
jmo

2023 Indiana Code
Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure
Article 42. Offenses Against the Person
Chapter 1. Homicide​

Sec. 1. A person who:

(1) knowingly or intentionally kills another human being;

(2) kills another human being while committing or attempting to commit arson, burglary, child molesting, consumer product tampering, criminal deviate conduct (under IC 35-42-4-2 before its repeal), kidnapping, rape, robbery, human trafficking, promotion of human labor trafficking, promotion of human sexual trafficking, promotion of child sexual trafficking, promotion of sexual trafficking of a younger child, child sexual trafficking, or carjacking (before its repeal);

 
Honest question - if a D team find strong exculpatory evidence, let’s say an unbreakable alibi, as they conduct their own investigation, what would the process be to raise this? Bring to police? DPP? Court? Would this move quickly?
Good question. Found this - but when is the omnibus date? Did it happen already? IDK.

2012 Indiana Code
TITLE 35. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
ARTICLE 36. PRETRIAL NOTICES, MOTIONS, AND PROCEDURES
CHAPTER 4. NOTICE OF ALIBI DEFENSE​

IC 35-36-4
Chapter 4. Notice of Alibi Defense
IC 35-36-4-1
Time of filing; requisite information

Sec. 1. Whenever a defendant in a criminal case intends to offer in his defense evidence of alibi, the defendant shall, no later than:
(1) twenty (20) days prior to the omnibus date if the defendant is charged with a felony; or
(2) ten (10) days prior to the omnibus date if the defendant is charged only with one (1) or more misdemeanors;
file with the court and serve upon the prosecuting attorney a written statement of his intention to offer such a defense. The notice must include specific information concerning the exact place where the defendant claims to have been on the date stated in the indictment or information.

 
Good question. Found this - but when is the omnibus date? Did it happen already? IDK.

2012 Indiana Code​

TITLE 35. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE​

ARTICLE 36. PRETRIAL NOTICES, MOTIONS, AND PROCEDURES​

CHAPTER 4. NOTICE OF ALIBI DEFENSE​

IC 35-36-4
Chapter 4. Notice of Alibi Defense
IC 35-36-4-1
Time of filing; requisite information

Sec. 1. Whenever a defendant in a criminal case intends to offer in his defense evidence of alibi, the defendant shall, no later than:
(1) twenty (20) days prior to the omnibus date if the defendant is charged with a felony; or
(2) ten (10) days prior to the omnibus date if the defendant is charged only with one (1) or more misdemeanors;
file with the court and serve upon the prosecuting attorney a written statement of his intention to offer such a defense. The notice must include specific information concerning the exact place where the defendant claims to have been on the date stated in the indictment or information.

 
Sorry @steeltowngirl don't have time this morning to discuss, but here is date from CCS:
11/22/2022Order Issued
Defendant appears in person and with counsel. State by Prosecuting Attorney. Hearing held on State's Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access to a Court Record. Matter taken under advisement. Defendant's Petition to Let to Bail ordered set for hearing in Carroll Circuit Court on February 17, 2023 at 10:00 am. Court to enter transport order. Omnibus date rescheduled to February 17, 2023 at 10:00 am by agreement of counsel
Judicial Officer:
Gull, Frances -SJ

Order Signed:
 
Good question. Found this - but when is the omnibus date? Did it happen already? IDK.

2012 Indiana Code​

TITLE 35. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE​

ARTICLE 36. PRETRIAL NOTICES, MOTIONS, AND PROCEDURES​

CHAPTER 4. NOTICE OF ALIBI DEFENSE​

IC 35-36-4
Chapter 4. Notice of Alibi Defense
IC 35-36-4-1
Time of filing; requisite information

Sec. 1. Whenever a defendant in a criminal case intends to offer in his defense evidence of alibi, the defendant shall, no later than:
(1) twenty (20) days prior to the omnibus date if the defendant is charged with a felony; or
(2) ten (10) days prior to the omnibus date if the defendant is charged only with one (1) or more misdemeanors;
file with the court and serve upon the prosecuting attorney a written statement of his intention to offer such a defense. The notice must include specific information concerning the exact place where the defendant claims to have been on the date stated in the indictment or information.

Isn't the omnibus usually held shortly after the arraignment? They never held it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
146
Total visitors
219

Forum statistics

Threads
608,634
Messages
18,242,717
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top