girlhasnoname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 9,507
- Reaction score
- 120,400
Exactly. They want to move the timeline for a time when RA has a alibi and BH hasn't a solid alibi (probably for a time when his alibi is he was at home). Also BG don't look like any of the odinists. They want to suppress the video too.And that alibi for BH is the reason that the DT is now heavily pushing that theory of the girls being moved from the location and returned hours later. They want to nullify that alibi. IMO
Exactly. They want to move the timeline for a time when RA has a alibi and BH hasn't a solid alibi (probably for a time when his alibi is he was at home). Also BG don't look like any of the odinists. They want to suppress the video too.
Yes, they want the State to be punished for late discovery and one of the things they want is to supress Libby's phone data and BG's video. I don't blame them for trying. I understand it's their job trying to supress things which aren't good for their client. BG's video isn't good for RA because the timeline, the clothing, a girl mentioning a gun, the 3 witnesses, etc. IMOThe bridge video?
Is there any evidence they do want in?![]()
Agreed IMO. They can't place RA away from the scene of the crime at ToD, so need to have the girls be elsewhere at their ToD."The thought of them being removed and returned is preposterous."
I agree. So why are the DT so invested in this narrative, that the girls were taken from the area but then returned sometime later? Especially when it does not make a lot of sense...
I think the only reason they are so invested in this potential scenario is because they don't have an alibi for RA during the key times---1:30 to 3:30 pm----but the Odinists do have an alibi for that window of time.
...but if they can move the actual murders until a more convenient time for the defense theory, they can give RA an alibi and take the Odinist leader's alibi away.