StarryStarryNight
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2017
- Messages
- 3,425
- Reaction score
- 41,940
I don’t believe anything anyone says without evidence. There is more than one blue jacket in Indiana. RL was on the news the next day in full bridge guy drip. People called in to the tipline thinking BG was him. Owning a blue jacket is not enough evidence to convict a person. MOO
—RA put himself on the bridge that day minutes before the girls arrived.
—A WITNESS can testify she saw him there. She corroborates his own statement.
—The TIME the witness saw him on the bridge that day is corroborated via security camera that recorded the time she arrived and the time she left.
—the time the girls arrived at the trails is also verified by security video.
This is in the PCA which is a document containing information that was sworn to as true under penalty of perjury. That is unlike the Franks Motion which is made up misleading fiction. I guarantee you the defense attorneys are not going to swear to the FM’s truthfulness under penalty of perjury.
People are trying to deflect attention away from this fact, but you can’t wish this away. RA, the killer, put himself on that bridge and no one has been able to take him off. Witnesses, timestamps, security cameras, corroborate his own words.
The defense’s brief attempt to question the timeline would require time portals. I expect to hear about that soon.
RA’s own words, witnesses, timestamps, security videos, confessions, and crime scene testimony that we heard in day 3 of the hearings is all that is needed to convict him. Don’t even need the unspent bullet in my opinion.
Opinion