StarryStarryNight
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2017
- Messages
- 3,500
- Reaction score
- 43,070
Then this is really difficult for me to find an innocent reason for then. He willingly comes forward to say he was there and what he was doing.. then shows DD the phone he had (assuming LE wanted this info to pinpoint those on the trail and where they were and when so they could put together a timeline from it and confirm they were there when BG was there, etc) Well then why wouldn't his phone he admits to having on the trail be there then?
Similar to the the Schrödinger’s Cat experiment, this situation paints RA as a liar and as truthful at the same time resolved only by hearing testimony saying whether or not RA’s phone was at the trails that day.
Unlike Schrödinger’s cat, who is either dead or alive once the box is opened, RA is dead no matter the outcome.
If RA’s phone was at the trails that day, he has been truthful, yet by placing himself there, he must remain a suspect.
If RA’s phone does not show as being at the trails, he lied to LE about looking at his phone at the trails or did not have it on, which, at best, is sketchy behavior.
Schrodinger’s cat is either alive or dead but RA is dead every time the box is opened, no matter whether the phone shows him as being there or not, no matter whether he lied or not.
The reason is RA admitted to being on the bridge at the same time the girls were approaching it. He’s still there.
Schrodinger’s Phone…things are always as they are.