RANCH
United we stand, divided we fall.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 18,282
- Reaction score
- 39,115
:biggrin: The 'FUND'
What fund?
:biggrin: The 'FUND'
What fund?
It wouldn't have happened to my child.
When I go on a family vacation, I spend my time with my family.
I certainly would not leave babies alone to meet up with friends every night and every morning drop them off at the resort daycare.
If I wanted an adult carefree vacation, I'd leave my children at home, with their grandparents.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not necessarily trying to defend the parents here, but if you read through the missing children's cases, you'll find quite a few where a sleeping child was taken out a window while a *caregiver was in the next room*. Kids have been snatched from front yards while their mothers screamed and ran after the car. It's rare, but it does happen.
And an aside: spending all day in resort daycare playing with other kids used to be one of the things our kids looked forward to about resort vacations. Again, not necessarily defending the parents, but it's too easy to take normal decisions and use them as a club on people who have already had a terrible thing happen to them.
The kids were in the creche every day.
The same Nannies were available to baby-sit.
There was a also a night-creche (just ask 'Tannerman')
There's NO excuse for leaving all 3 kids alone every night !
BBM - They weren't even in the same building
Scotland Yard is a joke. Officially.
I get what your saying but...
The U.K. media has bombarded us with this story for 7 years.
During which ignoring most of the facts.
The libel trials & 'gaggings' (not just on-going one) which there's been a few - U.K. residents, are hardly if at all mentioned.
The McCanns, for whatever reason, are getting all this attention & support, for what essentially was down to them leaving 3 'very young' children alone in an un-secured flat while going to a bar every evening !
Whatever the British press assumes we are not stupid & know how to access the 'web'
Not only do we see that we are being fed a load of BS but many of us have also seen/read the Portuguese (PJ) Files :wink:
And Honestly, if we believed there was a chance of finding a 'live' Maddie the cost wouldn't be such an issue.
*Ask Kerri Needham how much help or funding SHE GOT !*
Sadly, I believe little Maddie has become secondary to what is truly going on.
Just to add: I think most of these sites HAVE already been searched at least once.
That's not what I said. I said that even if somebody had been in the next room, that might not have stopped a theoretical kidnapper. There have been cases where it hasn't.
Even though that maybe true, what's the chances of them opening the shutters and the window without the parents hearing? Little too none if what the mccanns say is true there is know way if they had been home they would not have heard! If the upstairs neighbor could hear them kids crying at night I just don't see how its possible they wouldn't have heard. This is all MOO of course....
There is a load of evidence in this case, all pointing one way.
The GNR, the Leics police, the PJ and now the Met have all investigated, and whatever evidence they have found has implicated the parents. We know this as they've told us...all except SY, but the digs seem to confirm the same theory.
IMO the reason they are digging before interviewing, is because the 8 suspects have already been interviewed, back in 2007.
The digs are clearly based on new information, either the cellphone pings and/or someone's talking.
I would bet money that one of the Tapas is blabbing. They all lied and surely one or two of them can see the entire house of cards is about to collapse and is scrambling to save their own butts.
There is a load of evidence in this case, all pointing one way.
The GNR, the Leics police, the PJ and now the Met have all investigated, and whatever evidence they have found has implicated the parents. We know this as they've told us...all except SY, but the digs seem to confirm the same theory.
IMO the reason they are digging before interviewing, is because the 8 suspects have already been interviewed, back in 2007.
The digs are clearly based on new information, either the cellphone pings and/or someone's talking.
I would bet money that one of the Tapas is blabbing. They all lied and surely one or two of them can see the entire house of cards is about to collapse and is scrambling to save their own butts.
This is the most plausible explanation from those on the table.
I can understand the McCanns constructing this whole thing to protect their lives but I have to wonder why the Tapas eaters would have joined in as well.
Perhaps they all got sucked in on day one and decided after that it was too risky to change their stories. ...