ChinaBlue
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2011
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 0
Welcome! Great Q. And I do not know. I was surprised that JM was allowed to accuse many of the experts of lying. That is a huge charge to me...., the witness may be incompetent, bias ect. but to accuse them of lying was one of the reasons I am not a fan of JM. But the judge is this case also baffled me becuase I found no sense in her overruled/sustains on either side. I'm sure lawyers on this thread could see the rational..but I could not.
bbm
Who cares?
JM set out on a path to prove a point (many points, in fact) and he did. Travis Alexander was NOT butchered in an act of self defense but, in fact, WAS butchered in an (and by) act of pure hatred and fury by a person spurned by hom.
Wake up and smell the roses.
I applaud JM for his relentless pursuit to get to the truth and arrive at some modicum of justice for Travis. There will never be "closure" (I hate word) for his family but there will be some semblance of justice...and you can mark my words on that!