Mrs G Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,077
- Reaction score
- 6,178
Letter: the only danger Travis was ever in with me was 'spiritual danger' yeah, right.
I am not a lawyer but I was thinking about the Manson case. During the trial, President Nixon made an off the cuff remark about the Manson killing people and he did not use the word "alleged." The judge checked and the jury had not read or heard anything about any public figure commenting on the case so that was that until Manson shouted out to the jury that President Nixon thought he was guilty. His attorneys tried to get a mistrial but failed since Manson had deliberately caused the problem himself. The motion was denied.
Here we have Jodi choosing to do something ill-advised -- which is her right to do. However, it could be that her attorneys are arguing that she would ONLY do that if she were not competent (like Cheney Mason arguing that Casey turning down a plea bargain was a sign of incompetence). And if she were then found to be incompetent maybe they could use something in the evaluation that they could use for mitigation.
That guy was arrested! :yay:
Attention Peeps!
Breaking News. Even HLN doesn't know it!
:bump:
Justice4Travis ‏@Justice4TravisA 4m
Arias' letter to Ryan Burns - sent from jail http://fb.me/K5NaQRHl
---------------------
I had to be signed on to Facebook to see it. It's quite faint and hard to read.
I am not a lawyer but I was thinking about the Manson case. During the trial, President Nixon made an off the cuff remark about the Manson killing people and he did not use the word "alleged." The judge checked and the jury had not read or heard anything about any public figure commenting on the case so that was that until Manson shouted out to the jury that President Nixon thought he was guilty. His attorneys tried to get a mistrial but failed since Manson had deliberately caused the problem himself. The motion was denied.
Here we have Jodi choosing to do something ill-advised -- which is her right to do. However, it could be that her attorneys are arguing that she would ONLY do that if she were not competent (like Cheney Mason arguing that Casey turning down a plea bargain was a sign of incompetence). And if she were then found to be incompetent maybe they could use something in the evaluation that they could use for mitigation.
Attention Peeps!
Breaking News. Even HLN doesn't know it!
:bump:
PLEASE look upthread! The statute of limitations is one year AFTER criminal conviction. They can file!
deleted