Bulldog23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2015
- Messages
- 209
- Reaction score
- 391
Bulldog- What about these murders points to a “sex offense”?
Other than the “semen” on J.B.’s shirt.
(Which was found on J.B.’s clothing three months after the murders, after it had been sitting in the Ozark evidence room.)
Crime scene photos, and autopsy’s clearly show neither of the girls had been sexually assaulted. If this were a sexually motivated murder- why weren’t they sexually assaulted?
The statement "you have to assume it came from a sex offense," IIRC was from David Emory who was the DA in Dale County at that time (Correct me if I am wrong, going from memory). So I am assuming, at least, he believed it. I don't know for sure, but I am guessing he was referring to an oral sexual assault or something of the sort, since they was no evidence of rape. And if it were not for that DNA, Barrentine might have spent the rest of his life in prison.
Now, if you are right, and this had nothing to do with a sex offense, then the DA was mistaken or putting out false information. That brings to mind the lady in your film that said, this case was very solvable, if it had been investigated correctly from the beginning.
Shined Rabbit, I think I have a good idea who you feel is responsible for the murders. (Since there is a rule against sleuthing families, I think we should leave it at that.) Do you think that person might have had help? There is something about this crime, maybe the dominance it took to do it, that makes me think a male was involved in the actual murders. I could be wrong, thoughts?