margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,182
(About dang time. I can’t believe it took this long.)
Dang. We have several people on here who have overcome addiction issues and are fine, humble people. That’s a nasty generalization. During addiction yes, many are very selfish. But even when clean? How can you say that on this thread?
We do know that she did not attempt to confirm PH's well being after receiving that horrifying text. We do know that her story has changed several times. There are several other incriminating tidbits that I can't pass along here as well. Is she guilty? I dunno, but there certainly is a lot of sketchy information about this person that needs to be answered for.
I knew this case was missing something other than a media thread! It’s the ....moo’s!
I have a gut feeling that is what happened. No idea why, but my hinky meter is off the charts on this case.
Dang. We have several people on here who have overcome addiction issues and are fine, humble people. That’s a nasty generalization. During addiction yes, many are very selfish. But even when clean? How can you say that on this thread?
Welp. That’s a sweeping generalization and not at all true, but I hope some day you get to meet someone who is clean that can change your mind. Yikes. I’m sorry you feel that way.Right, but no one spent energy on burying someone. These people are a selfish bunch, even when they get clean, it is all about them, how awesome they are to recover...on and on...honestly, drug addicts are too self absorbed to care about burying someone. They would happily dump them out of the car, and keep on going, life is a party. Burying someone, is not a party. They wouldn't bother.
Speculation abounds
I think she went to the bar. I think her coworker went too, and maybe even more than one coworker/friend.
I think she left the bar for reasons unknown, with the two men, maybe others. I don't have an issue with her, or the alleged men NOT being on camera. She, and her coworker who says she left with the two men, could very well have been standing in the parking lot when she left, or on the street having a smoke.....not necessarily IN the bar.
She may have simply been looking for a ride out of there, maybe with the promise of the two men to drive to another bar/location/back to her car.
I think it entirely possible that others became involved. She could have been doped by those with evil intentions (I think this entirely possible). Drug her up, sexually abuse, murder, then get rid of the body.
The thing I'm trying to figure out, is what led LE to the Pinewood Avenue location, near the tracks that run by Allison Bonnet park?
And secondly, if I were disposing of a body, I'd be REAL concerned about getting caught. So pulling in to that driveway on Chapel Drive, parking my car/van, and taking the time to do that would be risky.
I did notice a junkyard at the end of Chapel, about a football field away from the home where she was found.
I've also considered that a get together may have gone down right at the Chapel Drive home, she was there, being hastily buried by intoxicated/stoned individual(s) in the yard. Maybe the people living around there were used to the local yahoo's having parties there and thought nothing of it, or wished not to get involved.
Speculation abounds!
I'm not able to keep up this is going too fast. a friend of mine from AL was saying they do have video of her leaving w these BBM but i thought LE said there is no video of this. amirite or is this a new development?
I think that one of them has already talked, thats why we have a body. You simply cannot arrest people based on what one person says. That all needs backed up with other witnesses or hard evidence.The more people involved the more likely it is that at least one of them will talk. Groups of people involved in something like this cannot be quiet about it. Even if they don’t tell LE they will tell someone end it will trickle back.
It seems like a group would have done a better job of hiding her body but when people are using their minds don’t work all that well.
JMO
We do know that her story has changed several times.
Right, but no one spent energy on burying someone. These people are a selfish bunch, even when they get clean, it is all about them, how awesome they are to recover...on and on...honestly, drug addicts are too self absorbed to care about burying someone. They would happily dump them out of the car, and keep on going, life is a party. Burying someone, is not a party. They wouldn't bother.
We don't from MSM or LE, Marg. They're referring to something from SM..We do?
DBM, not worth it.Maybe, but mickey2942 is right on the money with their assessment IMO.
Dang. We have several people on here who have overcome addiction issues and are fine, humble people. That’s a nasty generalization. During addiction yes, many are very selfish. But even when clean? How can you say that on this thread?
Okay my thoughts fwiw...
When I am trying to know whether I can reach someone if I need to ask them something or just to know if they are available, I always text a quick "r u there?" or similar. Often if I want to talk to my daughter about something I cannot discuss in front of others when I am at work, I do that and when she responds that she is there, I'll say I'll call her. If I was in a bad situation, whomever was first on my text list I would first make sure they had their phone and were responding to me. If I couldn't verify that, I'd text my next lifeline...then I would continue with "answer if I call...feel in trouble...don't know these peeps...etc." But that's just me.
I just never liked the text PH "sent." IF PH sent it, what was her expectation? She had no assurance it was received (which apparently it wasn't at the time) so PH could not count on that person being there if she needed her. If PH was of sound enough mind to send that over wordy text, I would think it would be easier to just say, "where are you? I need a ride" or "I messed up. I don't know where I am. I'm gonna call you." There was no reason to mention who she was with if not other than to shift blame AWAY from the people who were known to be with her last. If she thought she was in danger, but not ready to ask for help, why text at all? Also, when she did not receive a response, she did not follow up. I think the text was sent after whatever happened went down from those responsible. The first inclination was to try to remove the last people known to have been with her from focus (when she is discovered which they knew would obviously happen eventually.) They could have not sent anything...but then why not "help" their situation by implying she was with people she didn't know. Whoever sent it already decided they would not answer and make up why, "fell asleep, phone died, didn't hear it, etc." Made sense at the time.