Alabama Law Enforcement Agency- Contact
From Alabama Sex Offenders Registry. Different address, maybe just hasn't been updated...
I believe it's because in AL LE can only hold an individual for 48 hours without attaining a warrant. And at the time, they didn't have enough evidence request a warrant.I wonder why LE held FH for 48 on a kidnapping charge. Obviously they knew he was involved. Were they hoping to find enough evidence during those 48 to make that charge stick or another serious charge. It could have backfired as he may have run because of such a serious charge.
I just don't know why, but I do not believe PH willingly left with anyone but her friends she went to the club with. Now they could ALL have left with two males and they ALL could have been with PH and FH the night of the 20th and the morning of the 21st. But PH did not go alone with two males without others.
I just don't know why, but I do not believe PH willingly left with anyone but her friends she went to the club with. Now they could ALL have left with two males and they ALL could have been with PH and FH the night of the 20th and the morning of the 21st. But PH did not go alone with two males without others.
Definitely increases the likelihood PH was sexually assaulted and that was the motivation for FH to pull her into his sphere. It seems like a reasonable possibility that he lured her with promises of drugs and fun and then things went downhill once she realized he had brought her to a crack house.I'm just hearing the latest.
Wondering how his being a sex offender fits into all this scenario. That doesn't sound good.
Definitely increases the likelihood PH was sexually assaulted and that was the motivation for FH to pull her into his sphere. It seems like a reasonable possibility that he lured her with promises of drugs and fun and then things went downhill once she realized he had brought her to a crack house.
BBM--- I agree and in most states the bolded part WOULD be kidnapping, but in Alabama apparently not. Unless we are both reading the statue wrong. Maybe a lawyer could weigh in on this.I didn't watch the PC, but I do find the phrasing of the response to the question of whether she was willingly with FH interesting.
“We are saying they were together. There is no evidence there was any force.” They also said, "We have evidence the victim and the offender were together the night of Dec. 20, 2019."
Paighton Houston update: Man charged with abuse of corpse, no physical trauma led to death
To me, it sounds like they have no evidence she was forced, but they are also not entirely convinced she was with him willingly. Their thinking may even be that she was with him under false pretenses on his end, so even if PH was initially with him willingly, it wasn't really willing in the traditional sense since she was being misled.
I did look up what constituted kidnapping in Alabama--what he was initially held for. I was wondering if her being unable to leave after she went somewhere willingly would count as kidnapping, but the phrasing--to my, admittedly, non-legal mind--sounded more like taking by force was required for that charge. I suspect that may have been why he was released--they just don't have any evidence right now that confirms she left under duress. MOO
Yeah that's what threw me too--I just assumed going willingly and then not being allowed to leave would be considered kidnapping. I'd love to hear from an AL attorney on this--and what the likely charge would be for either that scenario or going willingly but under mistaken pretenses because the person you are with is being deceptive.BBM--- I agree and in most states the bolded part WOULD be kidnapping, but in Alabama apparently not. Unless we are both reading the statue wrong. Maybe a lawyer could weigh in on this.
He does have a show on ID TV.BBM--- I agree and in most states the bolded part WOULD be kidnapping, but in Alabama apparently not. Unless we are both reading the statue wrong. Maybe a lawyer could weigh in on this.
Hi Boscoe
I find it hard to believe a violent sexual offender who gang raped and sodomized a woman previously, that has been confirmed to have been with the victim at the bar that night and the next day, who disposed of her body, is not also directly associated with/responsible for her death. There may indeed be others involved, but I don’t think that absolves him of being directly involved as well. (Will more than one DNA profile come back? )
If they thought this was the case, that he only “abused the corpse”, then his charges may include Felony Accessory After the Fact. But then again, they need to prove murder to begin with, which as we know COD and tox are still being completed.
I said I am done speculating but I changed my mind - I’m going with walk like a duck, talk like a duck on this one. Sure, crazy coincidences exist, I’ve seen them occur many times here on WS, but his criminal history is just too hard for me to ignore. As LE has confirmed, it seems he is the last one that was with the victim, even before the “abuse of the corpse”.
I have a question regarding WS rules for this case. Can a MOD or well seasoned member please tell me exactly who has officially been named by MSM? I'm going to do some research on Alabama's court database and do not want to post any information that would violate the rules. I am assuming that alacourt.com would be a reliable source since all cases there are public record but it is a pay website for Alabama attorneys to track their cases. Thanks so much.
That and apparently LE must have thought he kidnapped her to begin With and probably just had no proof.100 Percent right there with you. Well said.