Momma2cam
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2016
- Messages
- 2,330
- Reaction score
- 5,941
I posted the reason for the violation upthread but there has been no discussion. It piqued my interest as well.
I thought the violation would be for "being on the run" or not listing his correct home address as his listed address clearly is not on McClain (assumption on my part that is where he lived) BUT this was stated at presser:
The deputy chief said Hampton was in compliance with his requirements as a sex offender prior to Houston’s disappearance and subsequent death
“After this offense, he did commit an offense which violated the Sex Offender Notification Act,” Agee saidAgee did not specify what that violation was.
So IF employed he stopped showing up to work the 20th.
So my big question is: Were they mistaken when they said that? They brought him in on the 28th so it would seem that would be the easiest reason to bring him in and hold him but they brought him in for the much bigger charge. Not knowing the non-compliance rules maybe there is a certain amount of leeway? What jobs can an SO have? I know it is hard for any felon to get one. I might be confusing myself or making a mountain out of a mole-hill.
ETA: link to quote above
Paighton Houston case: Registered sex offender sought for burying missing woman in shallow grave
Maybe he stopped showing up to work after he was released following the kidnapping hold? That would explain why they couldn't have kept him/ brought him in on the violation charge yet.