itsthevibe
Verified insider - Allison Baden-Clay case
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 766
- Reaction score
- 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by minni Possum, as usual, I am undecided! After much debate, I still 'feel' like she was placed there, and its based on only a few things. It seems unlikely she just happened to wash up and come to rest under the bridge. There is nothing there that 'snagged' her that stands out. To me. He has been charged with interfering with a corpse at kholo bridge which indicates the police believe he was there. Allicat got a feeling everytime she drove over the bridge in those 11 days before she was found. And finally, just my gut feeling. But the scout camp also seemed to provide a reasonable theory too, the others after a lot of discussion have (I think) discarded the idea she was tossed over or dragged down from this point. It makes more sense that she washed downbased on the lack of broken bones (and the hugely difficult task of climbing down there in the dark but I'm still hesitant to disregard my initial feeling
I thought it was interfering with a corpse at Kholo River, not bridge.
But I am also for the placing theory.
I agree with both of you. I really wish i'd been there today to discuss with those who got together, and i think it was a great idea. I respect their views because of the effort put into evaluating the different scenarios.
However I've been to the area twice and walked down the embankment and looked across to where the body was found. I feel it is possible, and not all that difficult. I agree it would be hard in the dark, but I thought if one person took the main weight of the body, and the accomplice just stabilised the lower legs and feet and also held a torch it could be done. Alternatively the perp drags the body down the slope and along under the bridge, with the accomplice carryng the torch.
I think it's the simplest explanation in one sense, and after realising how close houses are to the Scout Camp entrance I think that would be too risky, I just dont think they'd drive down there as a car would make too much noise and they would know that. Whereas the bridge itself is much further away from houses, and if you drive onto the vacant section there and back in as close as you can to where it slopes down, you could get the body out of the back of the vehicle quite quickly without being noticed.
I also thought that if GBC is the perp, and wanted the insurance money, he would want the body to be found, hence the placing of the body under the bridge. Whereas dumping the body in the river further up could indicate not wanting the body to be found.
That said, I do think there is merit in what our on-site sleuthers concluded today. But I just dont know how high the tide would have been at the time. The body was found in a fairly high position.