alioop
Verified Attorney (AU)
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,132
- Reaction score
- 4
So Alioop, the witnesses have been disclosed to the defence, but not all the evidence, is that how it is? (you've probably already explained this- my brain just doesn't store legal stuff )
I'm getting muddled up with hard, cold, physical evidence, such as soil samples, scratch analysis, autopsy, and witness evidence, such as behaviour, different versions of stories, possible sightings etc.
Do you think its fair to assume that we have pretty much heard all of the physical evidence that the prosecutors have?
Have all the study results been made available to the defence??
Is it just the witness evidence that will hold surprises????
I keep getting the feeling we have heard most of what the prosecution has as far as hard evidence goes. Maybe that feeling is wrong???
Hi Obsessor, all the evidence collected by the police has been given to the defence, including witness statements, forensics, autopsy reports, everything. Even evidence that doesn't suggest GBCs guilt, if any.
We are getting to hear about the physical evidence through the bail hearing applications but I am sure there is more that we havent heard of. And of course a lot more witnesses that we don't yet know about. The police collected hundreds of statements. There will be lots of surprises for us at the committal.