You know what bugs me? Why don't the media ask some tough questions of the bc's? Like the ones we've been asking? If he didn't do it who did? What is the truth that will be revealed? What were all their movements that night? Do they believe those scratches came from shaving? How did that blood get in the car? Why don't the parents provide statements? Why has this truth they claim to know not set him free so far?
And so on.
They can't expect to consistently proclaim to know the truth but then give no other explanation on what that is????
Stone the crows! (Please excuse the outback expletives.)For what it's worth, I'm a whole 5 inches shorter than ABC was and when I'm 72kg I'm a size 12, at 72kg she'd have to be a size 10 surely? As a size 12 I could never wear an XXL in any make - maybe a L but not an XXL.
Thanks Kimster :rocker:
I had a friend turn up today with scratches on his face in a similar position to GBC's but nowhere near as deep. I couldn't miss them and without even thinking exclaimed "What happened to you?" His answer .... "I fell off Mt Hotham"..... what he meant was that he'd been riding his pushbike up and over Mt Hotham from Harrietville (sheer madness in my book) and had a wee accident on his way down the hill which saw him rather inelegantly fly over the handle bars and tumble on down the hill.
My point is with that kind of accident and all of the other superficial injuries, the marks on his face were NOTHING compared the photo's of GBC's scratches. And there is no way on God's green earth I would NOT notice or NOT ask what happened.
above BBM
I think you'll find it's because of our sub judice laws the media can't ask the type of questions you're referring to, while the case is before the courts.
1. Publishing matter likely to prejudice a fair trial
http://www.thenewsmanual.net/Resources/medialaw_in_australia_03.html
Thanks for the shout-out Curious! Right back at you
I'm also interested in the 112 calls - what on earth would justify TWO of these calls? And for that period of time? I know when I've reported a disturbance in the middle of the night, it's a brief call - name, address, details of disturbance. That's basically it. To me, these 2 calls suggest it was something personal i.e. related to the BC's in some way. OR she was kept on hold for a long time. But even on busy nights, would someone ever be kept on hold for that length of time?
I am a little bit sad right now. Had almost completed Allison phone record dissection and my computer froze. I have tears in my eyes. I did not back it up and it took forever.
I will get it done but now I have to start from the beginning : (
I am a little bit sad right now. Had almost completed Allison phone record dissection and my computer froze. I have tears in my eyes. I did not back it up and it took forever.
I will get it done but now I have to start from the beginning : (
The lack of direct media exploration bugs me too, but in a sense things are moving along as they should. What I mean is that several authors are following this case closely, and it is expected at least one book will come out after the trial.
In which case, "back to normal" will never, ever, ever happen.
As some posters have pointed out, sadly, normal people know immediately that a disappearance means the end of normal forever.