I was just having a look at PMF forum, and perchance a poster has posed a question (as yet unanswered there) which has always bothered me as well (if one is looking from the purview that the 2 defendants are guilty):
He/She is asking if anyone there can give a plausible explanation for the following:
If the defendants are guilty and have simulated a break in and cleaned the hallway, what would motivate them to alert police and others (in a 112 emergency call and in an email home) about blood smears and footprints in the bathroom , which could implicate themselves? Why not throw away the mat, and scrub and wipe this sink and faucets during the clean up?
Again, this has always puzzled me : How pro-guilt posters can not be baffled by this. In any case, anyone venture to give a plausible explanation? TIA![Big Grin :D :D]()
He/She is asking if anyone there can give a plausible explanation for the following:
If the defendants are guilty and have simulated a break in and cleaned the hallway, what would motivate them to alert police and others (in a 112 emergency call and in an email home) about blood smears and footprints in the bathroom , which could implicate themselves? Why not throw away the mat, and scrub and wipe this sink and faucets during the clean up?
Again, this has always puzzled me : How pro-guilt posters can not be baffled by this. In any case, anyone venture to give a plausible explanation? TIA