The above linked email filtered through google translate, which makes no sense to me, but I understand that some people can read it
Email in googltrans:
"I am not present in the courtroom because I'm afraid . I fear that the vehemence of the prosecution will impress you , that their wool over your eyes will blind you . " Speaking of the accusations Amanda defines an " unfair and malicious abuse ."
" Meredith was my friend. She was nice to me , helped me , was generous and funny. She never criticized me. I was never even given a look. The prosecution - she continues - states that a rupture had taken place between me and Meredith for cleaning. This statement is a distortion of the facts. In the short period that Meredith and I were roommates and friends we never quarreled . "
"No one has ever seen or heard that Meredith and I had fought, quarrelled, discussed . Nobody ever said that Meredith was a freak antagonistic cleaning or that I was a freak antagonistic dirt . The prosecution would have you believe that this is the reason for the murder. But this is a disturbing distortion of the facts . "
"We need to recognize that a person can be brought to confess falsely because she psychologically tortured," she writes , referring to the slander against Patrick Lumumba. Amanda also tells of when they took her to the police station :
"They lied to me, yelled at me, threatened me, given me two slaps on the head. They told me that I would never see my family if I had not remembered what had happened to Meredith that night ."
"My behavior after the discovery of the murder indicates my innocence. I never thought or imagined that they would use my naive spontaneity to support their suspicions . I have not hidden my feelings when I needed comfort Raffaele hugged me when I was angry and I was making insensitive remarks ."
"I never showed antisocial, aggressive,violent or psychopathic behavior. I'm not addicted or obsessed with sex. When I was arrested I was tested for drugs and are found to be negative."
The Prosecution and civil parties "want you to think I'm a monster because it is easy to condemn a monster." Amanda, referring to the knife that she is supposed to have used for the murder, calls it an "invented evidence" and defines the prosecutions arguments as "theatrical arguments", "evidence inconclusive and unreliable" and also "disturbing and unacceptable distortion of the facts."
"The prosecution and civil parties - she adds - are committing injustices against me because they can not admit, even to themselves, that they have done terribly wrong. I did not kill. I have not raped. I have not plotted. I have not instigated. I was not there and had nothing to do with it. I am innocent - concludes Amanda - Raffaele is innocent. Meredith and her family deserve the truth. Please put an end to this enormous and exhausting injustice."
http://www.blitzquotidiano.it/crona...udici-firenze-non-vengo-italia-paura-1746860/