Found Deceased AMBER Alert issued for 11-year-old Livingston, TX Girl - Audrii Cunningham

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
oh, ty. I must have missed it.
I just registered that a backpack was found, and then 2 or three descriptions....camo, Hello Kitty ....do we know which is correct?
They haven't said in any of the pressers but it might be in one of the news articles. I have Hello Kitty in my head, but could be wrong.
 
One of the few clues in Audrii Cunningham’s disappearance might be a red “Hello Kitty” backpack she was supposed to carry to school with her last week.

“Once we get all that evidence put together (we will determine) what charges will be filed,” he said. “We want to make sure that whatever evidence that we collect, and that we place on an affidavit today, is going to be something that is going to hold up in the court later,” Lyons added.

McDougal has been “given several opportunities to cooperate,” according to Texas Department of Public Safety spokesperson Lt. Craig Cummings.

“And, we remain hopeful that he will begin helping in this case,” Cummings said.

The home is close to Lake Livingston – “one of the largest reservoirs in the state, with 83,000 surface acres,” according to Texas Parks & Wildlife. “The lake is an impoundment of the Trinity River, and provides water for the city of Houston and other East Texas cities.”
Authorities search for Audrii Cunningham, the 11-year-old Texas girl who vanished in Polk County on Thursday.

 
McDougal did not confess to crimes related to Audrii's disappearance, but has seemingly been cooperative with authorities, including escorting police to multiple "places of interest." However, Sheriff Lyons was quick to downplay any help or information offered by McDougal. "We don't want to share locations that he's taken us to," Lyons said, "other than to say that there are multiple places of interest that we have gone to and have made searches.

"We must not jump to conclusions," Lyons added. "We want to make sure that whatever evidence that we collect and that we place on an affidavit today is going to be something that's going to hold up in court later. It does us no good to prematurely charge him now."
 
TXDPS officials also said "McDougal was arrested on Saturday after confessing to assaulting a male following an argument," officials revealed, indicating that McDougal had been cooperative to some extent. There are also rumors circulating that McDougal may be affiliated with a Neo-Nazi group, Aryan Brotherhood, although this has not been confirmed.

He was taken into custody Friday on an unrelated assault charge. McDougal received a $500,000 bond for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon charge.

*eta:
Due to the "overwhelming support from our community," the Polk County Crime Stoppers have increased the reward for information that results in the location and arrest of persons involved in Audrii’s disappearance from $7,000 to $10,000.

"We feel strongly that the backpack found is hers," said TxDPS authorities. They highlighted one of the key pieces of evidence in the case. The investigation is now classified as a criminal investigation, with authorities stressing that charges are neither being added nor removed at this time

 
Last edited:
The sheriff seemed pretty confident during the presser that she disappeared at 645am. This was in response to a reporter asking why LE was inquiring about info from 3am. I think they must have good reason to believe the 645am time. LE usually doesn't reveal unconfirmed info in cases like this. Imo
 
SBM

But there are thousands of SA victims/survivors still alive, who share their stories on a daily basis?

That is true. Some SA survivors have responded in this thread. I failed at the attempted usage of the qualifier "almost". When I wrote the statement, I'd seen his RS and mugshots. That face scares me.
 
There have always been people like him. I know someone who was SA'd on her way home from school in the '60's. He wasn't caught. I do wonder if it happens more often now, ththough.
I think we are just more aware of it now. 25 years ago you just wouldn't be hearing about a child going missing in Texas, here in the UK. It makes it seem much more prevalent.
 
To think this young girl walked a half-mile every morning by herself just makes me sad.
In our school district, the bus doesn't pick up or drop off kids who live within a half mile of the school. Either the parents have to drive them or they have to walk. So it doesn't really surprise me that she walked a half mile to the bus stop.
 
In our school district, the bus doesn't pick up or drop off kids who live within a half mile of the school. Either the parents have to drive them or they have to walk. So it doesn't really surprise me that she walked a half mile to the bus stop.
From what I have read about S McD, Audrii likely was not safe around him, even at home. So, the walk to the bus stop wasn’t the problem. S McD, and wherever he took her in his car, is the problem.
 
We get an automated phone call at 7:00 pm and another one at 7:05 pm, even when it’s an approved absence. I agree that it’s less than helpful.
I work closely with schools in the UK and this system in your schools baffles me - surely that is a huge safeguarding concern?

In the UK the majority of schools start around 8:45 - in the first lesson / form time the teacher takes a register on the schools information management system - this has to be done by 9:15 - the attendance / admin officer then checks the register and it pulls through to the schools messaging service - (usually school spider or parent pay) this system can then send a text message asking each of the unauthorised absence children’s parents to contact the school office immediately.

The attendance officer would then work through the list phoning the absent students whose parents haven’t made contact (starting with most vulnerable students first) - this process tends to be completed by 10:30am in the schools I’ve been involved with.

Don’t get me wrong I doubt these stronger safeguarding systems would have ultimately saved Audrii - but it might have meant they were onto the POI quicker which may have helped with the recovery of Audrii’s body.

Schools in the UK would be graded inadequate by OFSTED if it was their policy to notify parents that a child was absent late into the evening.

I really hope changes to your attendance systems can be looked at as a result of this sad case.
 
Don Steven McDougal, the “main person of interest” in the disappearance of Audrii Cunningham, was the last person to see the 11-year-old girl, authorities said Monday.

Lyons said McDougal was a friend of Audrii’s father and lived in a trailer behind the house where the child lived with her father, grandparents and other family members. On several occasions, Lyons said McDougal had previously taken Audrii to the bus stop or taken her directly to school if she missed the bus.

According to the Texas Department of Safety, investigators named Don Steven McDougal, 42, as one of the persons of interest in Audrii’s disappearance Saturday. Lyons said Monday that McDougal was the main person of interest in the case, but they were not ruling out anyone else.

*wondering what relationship to Audrii these other family members are.
 
I work closely with schools in the UK and this system in your schools baffles me - surely that is a huge safeguarding concern?

In the UK the majority of schools start around 8:45 - in the first lesson / form time the teacher takes a register on the schools information management system - this has to be done by 9:15 - the attendance / admin officer then checks the register and it pulls through to the schools messaging service - (usually school spider or parent pay) this system can then send a text message asking each of the unauthorised absence children’s parents to contact the school office immediately.

The attendance officer would then work through the list phoning the absent students whose parents haven’t made contact (starting with most vulnerable students first) - this process tends to be completed by 10:30am in the schools I’ve been involved with.

Don’t get me wrong I doubt these stronger safeguarding systems would have ultimately saved Audrii - but it might have meant they were onto the POI quicker which may have helped with the recovery of Audrii’s body.

Schools in the UK would be graded inadequate by OFSTED if it was their policy to notify parents that a child was absent late into the evening.

I really hope changes to your attendance systems can be looked at as a result of this sad case.
On occasion the automated phone system is wrong though. Recently my grandson’s school messaging system informed of absence but daughter saw him walk in the front door.
Human and computer error happen.
 
I do wonder if it happens more often now, though.
Yes, I think it does happen a bit more often nowadays. Not really because people are "more evil", but because there is more opportunity.

Back in the day (and still in my corner of the earth), people lived in the same town or village where there parents and grandparents and great-grandparents and their parents etc had lived. Everyone knows everyone, everyone talks. Gossip gets around fast. Faces and cars are known. People watch out for each other. If anyone gives vibes that they are "odd" about children, people will keep an eye on them, will not allow them alone near children etc. You could not really except to get away with it, and people used to feel more societal pressure to "behave", to not embarrass their families etc - not all of them, of course, but on average. So there really was a bit less stuff like that.

As for DS M here, he did not snatch the kid from the bus stop, the distance and the walking had nothing to do with the story. Drugs might be involved. His own personality and life story are the biggest players here. I assume there was grooming involved, stuff escalated ant that's the outcome. He is also one of the people who is unlikely to be held back by societal pressure - by now at least - so the societal changes are not so directly important in this specific case, though interesting on the whole.

By now, the priorities IMO are to 1) find Audrii, 2) charge the culprit, and 3) really think about prevention methods here - not in an angry revenge-centered way, not in a super political way, not with locking kids up "to protect them", but to actually and scientifically analyse if and what we can do as a society to prevent creating such criminals to begin with.
 
On occasion the automated phone system is wrong though. Recently my grandson’s school messaging system informed of absence but daughter saw him walk in the front door.
Human and computer error happen.
100% there can be human error - but in these cases a phone call to the school office and then the office member checking the classroom for the child can quickly rectify the issue - I know when the system gets it wrong it can worry a parent but I’d much prefer our system to pretty much having no system at all.
 
That is true. Some SA survivors have responded in this thread. I failed at the attempted usage of the qualifier "almost". When I wrote the statement, I'd seen his RS and mugshots. That face scares me.

I think I took your meaning in the original post. If the crime occurred as stated: "a child went missing from her bus stop and the most likely person to have taken her is a male with crimes against children on his record," then statistically speaking, the most likely motive for that crime is sexual assault and the most likely outcome is that the child would be dead within 30 minutes to an hour over half the time; dead within three hours over 75% of the time. These statistics are readily available from Department of Justice studies that have been published. So I think I caught your drift - these kids are almost always murdered after an offense with the characteristics of this one, sometimes to silence them but other times just as part of the commission of the crime.

The thing about this case that makes it different from the typical "missing from a public place" abduction is that the main POI was not a stranger to the victim, having lived on the property; and, we have reason to believe that she didn't go missing from the bus stop but that foul play likely occurred before that (or, at least the trip to the bus stop didn't occur exactly as stated). I think similar cases to this one would be the murder of Amberly Barnett or the murder of Celina Cass, both "went missing" first but were murdered by males associated to the family through marriage with a sexual motivation. So yes, this case fits the pattern of the ones where the child victim usually does not survive and we can all sense it, much as we hope that it is not the case.
 
The sheriff seemed pretty confident during the presser that she disappeared at 645am. This was in response to a reporter asking why LE was inquiring about info from 3am. I think they must have good reason to believe the 645am time. LE usually doesn't reveal unconfirmed info in cases like this. Imo
I wonder if 6:45am is the last time someone can confirm seeing her other than SD. If she lived in a home with her parents, grandparents, and family, I'm making the assumption someone saw her in the house getting ready for school and ushered her out the door at least, whether it was to walk to the bus stop or to be driven by SD.
 
I wonder if 6:45am is the last time someone can confirm seeing her other than SD. If she lived in a home with her parents, grandparents, and family, I'm making the assumption someone saw her in the house getting ready for school and ushered her out the door at least, whether it was to walk to the bus stop or to be driven by SD.
That’s what I’m wondering also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
202
Guests online
278
Total visitors
480

Forum statistics

Threads
608,487
Messages
18,240,253
Members
234,387
Latest member
emi_
Back
Top