Your conclusions are right on. Reading your post was like rereading my own notes and questions from that time. Although I should be convinced otherwise by now I can not yet rule out the certainty that she did not fall into the creek. It is the most simple and likely scenario. Despite the countless searches there is the possibility that we somehow missed her. Mother Nature and water combine in trecherous deceits. There is a cold case in Wyoming where a young bride was pushed into a winter creek (admitted to by husband) and still not found after searches as extensive as our own. The depth of sorrow in her parents eyes was quite familiar. There is a damn on the creek, near the mouth, that supplies irrigation to the local farms. While the area was searched at the time, it was never drained. If unlimited funds were available I would direct them to a new comprehensive search of the ranch and creek. Anna's brother and I walked the creek for another two years after her disappearance but the area is still rural and has not to my knowledge been searched since.HeartofTexas said:I would be interested in hearing any theories anyone in the family, or the private investigator they hired, has on what might have happened to Anna.
I'm sure I'm simplifying any possible explanations but here are the few areas I think it boils down to:
(1) Anna drowned in the creek (next to zero chance, IMO, because not a shred of evidence was found indicating this happened).
(2) Anna was kidnapped by a pedophile. IMO, not a high chance of this because the area was pretty remote for a pedo to even discover the existence of Anna, let alone go traipsing after her and allow himself to be cornered on the property, so to speak.
(3) A desperate couple who wanted a child of their own kidnapped Anna. This one makes the most sense to me, whether the couple spotted her themselves or they were "led to her" by GW and GB. The fact that Anna was snatched from her backyard on a wet (and possibly rainy) day indicates to me that whoever came after her had travelled a good distance and didn't realize the area was so wet, but was only going there at that time based on the information that she got home from school around 1:00 p.m. IOW, someone who lived close by would have known the weather was too messy to go out prowling for a little girl and would have assumed she would be indoors on such a messy day. OTOH, someone traveling from a distance wouldn't have known anything about the weather and would have gone there at the time they did based only on the supposition she would be getting home from school at 1:00.
Since Anna was very bright and also 5-1/2 years old at the time she was abducted, it seems like she would have many memories from that time. And yet, with the vast amount of searching I've done on the internet, using so many different variations of key words that I've gone half-blind reading the screen, I've found absolutely nothing to indicate Anna was searching for her birth family under any of the clues I've been given. I assume Anna does not know her real date of birth and instead was given a fake DOB. I also assume that the people that snatched her made up some horrible story to explain to Anna why she was going to live with them. However, this many years later it seems like Anna would remember her two brothers and would be searching for them, no matter what she was told about her parents.
Does anyone have any ideas/thoughts to contribute to my ideas above, whether pro or con? I welcome any input.
I have recently come across a reference to an organization called "Necro Search International". Does anyone know anything about it? Possibly they have a website?