chipwhitley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2022
- Messages
- 181
- Reaction score
- 1,831
The one where she disappearedWhich interview? The one at the library on the 28th or the recent one where she disappeared?
The one where she disappearedWhich interview? The one at the library on the 28th or the recent one where she disappeared?
No CCTV footage of her being dropped off and getting into Lucy's car?
The Google link shows the surrounding trailers and the Handi-Stop. I’m thinking maybe no residential cams but feel perhaps LE has already ruled out certain statements made concerning the meet up by viewing any CCTV the mart may have. MOOI don’t think we will see Ring cams around the Handi-Stop Maysville Handi-Stop Inc
Not that I've read.The one where she disappeared
Here's one:In every scenario I've tried to imagine, I can't fit "Lucy" driving Ashley back to the meeting spot and being seen again by the fiance.
This would most likely require the baby to stay in the NICU.I'm starting to lean that way too because if there was a legit kidnapping of a pregnant woman, LE would be getting descriptions of person and vehicle out ASAP.
I also just said read that preterm babies born at 31 weeks have a survival rate of 90-95%, but I'm unsure if that number is based on hospitalization and medical access to a specialized nursery.
After reading the court papers... I am curious if the ex has been ruled out?According to court records, her ex husband is the bio dad of her two older kids. He has custody of those two kids. I think she got pregnant while going through the divorce, and her fiancé is the bio dad to that child. Here's a link to the court case info, hopefully the link doesn't time out. If it does, you can find the info by searching her name. Imo it seems like there may have been past custody issues. She accused her ex husband of being inappropriate towards the kids and she filed for emergency custody. But then the judge gave the ex husband full custody, so idk what the story is on that
Case Search • Arkansas Judiciary
caseinfo.arcourts.gov
The longer it goes with no update from LE isn't helping the public find her. JMO
LE might not need public input at this point. They may already have the information that they need.
It seems like we’re looking at two totally different crimes here which may be why the case is so darn weird.
Is this a job scam? The details fit. Or is it a fetal abduction? That seems to fit too.
But when you inspect both more closely neither makes much sense. Job scams entail the victim giving money to the scammer. There’s no mention of Lucy doing anything more than scheduling two interviews.
And fetal abduction is possible but why would the kidnapper put themself at risk by setting up an abduction over 4 or 5 days? And purposely driving past the fiancé and even making eye contact with him? That’s quite a trail.
I’m at a loss; two scams, one theft and one a violent crime running simultaneously? Very odd. MOO
You are speaking my hubby's love language. I tried to read this multiple times and couldn't make heads or tails of it. I just know I want rainbow LEDs on the bottom of my minivan (affectionately referred to as the BIGGIE van by my son...gee, thanks...) and my husband ain't done itWell, just for example, I have a 2004 VW Golf. It's a GLS 2.0L. In that year, you also have a GL, GL 2.0L, GL TDI, GLS TDI. The body style changed somewhat from the 2003 version, and during the 4-year window they made my Golf there were different paint colors available from the preceding and succeeding years. I love my VWs, but would be hard-pressed to tell which exact model I'm viewing, especially if it's in motion, but if I see the hood and ugly purply-blue color that was available during those years, I know it's likely a 2004-2008. I don't think if I saw you fly by me at 95 mph that I would be confident enough to say that you're definitely driving a 2006, but I would feel safe saying you're in a Golf produced in that 4-year range.
Just MOO based on my own experience.
In every scenario I've tried to imagine, I can't fit "Lucy" driving Ashley back to the meeting spot and being seen again by the fiance.
This would most likely require the baby to stay in the NICU.
After reading the court papers... I am curious if the ex has been ruled out?
I wonder if Lucy noticed somehow that their friendship (is that even what you would call it..?) was not going to continue. I could see a plan where a pregnant women is befriended this far ahead of the due date so 1) you know pertinent details about the pregnancy 2) you are one of the friends called when she does give birth and 3) you don't cause fear or alarm if you come to 'visit the baby'I’m also confused about “Lucy” driving back to the meeting spot with Ashley and seeing the fiance, only to drive off with her.
The only scenario I could come up with is if “Lucy” thought she would beat the fiance to the meeting spot. Then, through cellphone pings, she could claim that she dropped Ashley off at the meeting spot, but this plan was ruined when she arrived to the meeting spot and the fiance was already there. Of course, this plan is dependent upon the surveillance camera situation at and around the meeting spot, which “Lucy” may have been familiar with.
MOO.
Agree. If the purpose was fetal abduction (or sale, as Fiance said he thinks Lucy offered Ashley money for the baby and Ashley turned her down) It doesn't make sense to lure potential victims via a work from home scam. A work from home scam, even if posted in mom groups, is going to bring in possible interest from moms of older children, moms beyond child-bearing age, and even men (husband/boyfriends/friends of women in the mom group) That seems like A LOT of unnecessary sifting in an attempt to find a woman who is both pregnant AND looking for new employment. It would make more sense for the scam to be infant/baby/pregnancy based such as posing as a babysitter or Daycare Provider for infants under 6 weeks of age, selling baby clothes, nursery furniture or other baby items on FB marketplace or Craigslist, or posing as a sonographer from a non-existant 3D baby ultrasound place, prenatal massage therapist etc. Those types of scams wouldn't cast such a wide net, it would appeal specifically to pregnant women and moms of infants.It seems like we’re looking at two totally different crimes here which may be why the case is so darn weird.
Is this a job scam? The details fit. Or is it a fetal abduction? That seems to fit too.
But when you inspect both more closely neither makes much sense. Job scams entail the victim giving money to the scammer. There’s no mention of Lucy doing anything more than scheduling two interviews.
And fetal abduction is possible but why would the kidnapper put themself at risk by setting up an abduction over 4 or 5 days? And purposely driving past the fiancé and even making eye contact with him? That’s quite a trail.
I’m at a loss; two scams, one theft and one a violent crime running simultaneously? Very odd. MOO