believe09
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2007
- Messages
- 28,094
- Reaction score
- 540
I told you all a few weeks ago that I was going to put her into NAMUS, and I wanted to. I still do. But there isnt enough information. We dont have enough firm info for me to get her in there and make it count. After 90 days. It is incredibly sad and immensely frustrating. At the bare minimum, that mark/mole/scar/birthmark should go into the NCIC database. It is so much more than identifying Cassie if she is recognizable now...it is also about correctly and accurately identifying images that might be floating around out there. I have serious doubts about so much of her physical description-I am sure LE does as well. It looks bad when you cant accurately describe someone that you have spent enormous amounts of time with. It is a red flag.
I honestly dont know when Cassie was last seen. I dont know when she was last independently verified as being around. There are no pictures of derby. That is astonishing. So when was she actually seen for the very last time? smh. The crack she slipped through is the Grand Canyon.
I honestly dont know when Cassie was last seen. I dont know when she was last independently verified as being around. There are no pictures of derby. That is astonishing. So when was she actually seen for the very last time? smh. The crack she slipped through is the Grand Canyon.