My feelings on the death penalty are very complicated. I am both for it and against it. It really depends.
In Jodi's case, I am for it.
I am coming from a very complex philosophy of jurisprudence: I believe the entire penal/sentencing system in the US needs to be reworked and returned to its former underpinnings. When less frazzled, I can give a better explanation. :crazy::crazy: sorry, but thanks for asking.I would like to hear more about your feelings on the DP if and when you can share.
Yes, most of us are appalled at public beheadings in places like Saudi Arabia so I think method and access (sword or needle, public square vs. private execution chamber) must make some difference. I imagine beheading is a pretty quick and painless way to go.
Absolutely, well stated.Some times death would be easier then living life in prison. I have come to believe that death sentences are not the way to go. I have never had a loved one murdered or raped ect. I can see why some seek death for their loved ones and pray that I will never be in that position. The reason I am not for the death sentence is that innocent people are executed. You can never give back the greatest gift ...life. Nor would I ever want to take a life and find out it was not warrant. The tables switch when executer becomes the very thing they are trying to eradicate the taking of life.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/10-brain-myths6.htm
"Hillman also goes on to point out that the so-called painless guillotine is likely anything but. He states that "death occurs due to separation of the brain and spinal cord, after transection of the surrounding tissues. This must cause acute and possibly severe pain." This is one of the reasons why the guillotine, and beheading in general, is no longer an accepted method of execution in many countries with capital punishment."
Nah, I ain't buyin' it.
I don't have the studies at hand to quote here but there are reaction times to pain. The amount of time that it takes the neuro pathways to tell the brain that there has been trauma. My understanding from what I've read is that this happens so fast with the guillotine, it's over before the brain has time to react.
Now, on the other hand many, many written observations have been recorded during the French revolution about how the head would fall in the basket and the nuns would talk to the heads and their eyes would blink and mouths would move.
Of course, no one will ever know if this was a mere reflex or an awareness.
I wish I hadn't read this:Nah, I ain't buyin' it.
I don't have the studies at hand to quote here but there are reaction times to pain. The amount of time that it takes the neuro pathways to tell the brain that there has been trauma. My understanding from what I've read is that this happens so fast with the guillotine, it's over before the brain has time to react.
Now, on the other hand many, many written observations have been recorded during the French revolution about how the head would fall in the basket and the nuns would talk to the heads and their eyes would blink and mouths would move.
Of course, no one will ever know if this was a mere reflex or an awareness.
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1172/does-the-head-remain-briefly-conscious-after-decapitationThen I received a note from a U.S. Army veteran who had been stationed in Korea. In June 1989 the taxi he and a friend were riding in collided with a truck. My correspondent was pinned in the wreckage. The friend was decapitated. Here's what happened:
My friend's head came to rest face up, and (from my angle) upside-down. As I watched, his mouth opened and closed no less than two times. The facial expressions he displayed were first of shock or confusion, followed by terror or grief. I cannot exaggerate and say that he was looking all around, but he did display ocular movement in that his eyes moved from me, to his body, and back to me. He had direct eye contact with me when his eyes took on a hazy, absent expression and he was dead.
I've spoken with the author and am satisfied the event occurred as described. One can of course never be certain that anyone in this predicament is aware of his surroundings and realizes (briefly) what has happened to him. But I concede the possibility that he might.
Last night on JVM it mentioned that .Travis had bought engagement ring for a woman. He never gave it to her but it was taken from his home. Travis suspect it was Jodi that took it. Can anyone tell me if there is actual testimony of Jodi crawling through dog door?
http://realitychatter.forumotions.n...as-trial-for-the-murder-of-travis-alexander-2According to statements I have read re Deanna Reid:
IIRC, she is from So Cal. A person on another site said she has known DR and TA for along time. DR IS a very nice person. Reid and Travis did NOT have any type of sexual activity. They were both very much in love with each other.
This love, while not acted upon with marriage, etc., was the demon JA was fighting: JA knew how much others cared about TA and how he cared for them; JA wanted TA to care for her like he cared for them;
The longer the relationship with JA went on, the more TA seemed to value his female friends who HAD remained chaste; he was no longer "pushing" them for a "free feel" and more respectful. He seemed to appreciate/understand NOW the values the LDS church had tried to teach him.
Jodi had played her end card, SEX, at the start of the relationship. She left nothing to advance or grow to; she left nothing to mystery for Travis. IMO, Travis became aware he did not love Jodi; he did not want marriage with her; she was a sex object and he DID find the explorations of sex thrilling as any person does when they first start having sex.
Never play your end card or a trump card in first round.
Hold it for when it is of proper value.
I agree.
There is no evidence supporting the claim that Travis had any pedophilia tendencies or behavior. So it is highly likely that this is more of Jodi's character assassination attempts. Nor would it excuse premeditated murder even if founded in empirical evidence.
That said, as he was leading a double life there is nothing wrong with examining the claim.
I don't think Travis has the features indicated in this profile: I think he was far too gregarious, assertive, congenial, etc. Just what I have been able to glean thus far.
http://www.abusewatch.net/pedophiles.pdf
I agree.
There is no evidence supporting the claim that Travis had any pedophilia tendencies or behavior. So it is highly likely that this is more of Jodi's character assassination attempts. Nor would it excuse premeditated murder even if founded in empirical evidence.
That said, as he was leading a double life there is nothing wrong with examining the claim.
I don't think Travis has the features indicated in this profile: I think he was far too gregarious, assertive, congenial, etc. Just what I have been able to glean thus far.
http://www.abusewatch.net/pedophiles.pdf
In the 1930s in AZ a woman who'd gotten the death penalty was hanged, and her head popped off and landed near the horrified onlookers. She was the last woman on death row there to be "dispatched" since. I don't know if Jodi would prefer the solitude and quiet of death row over max-medium custody or not.
From what I have seen on the MSN program lock up exdended stay. Death row is not a bad place it is quiet they cell alone and have more room in cells. It is the med. max prison I would fear. Especially if you did a heinous crime or were high profile inmate.
The warden in Arizona is supposed to be tough. He has the male prisoners working chain gang and the farm on jail property. They are issued pink underwear and shirts and sleep in tents outside. I was really surprised to hers Jodi was reading star magazine and photo mags. Again the balance of male/female roles iare divided.