ozazure
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- Messages
- 1,730
- Reaction score
- 175
Ah. Not sure if that should actually solve any contempt issues, and not sure a judge will consider it. Sub judice is real, and one thing anyone involved in any aspect of the legal process can say with total authority is that judges do not take contempt lightly.
I'm totally perplexed as to why this aspect of law, and defamation law, is such an issue for some people to reconcile: the law is the law (is the law). It's not a personal interpretation of such; it just is what it is.
But, as I previously posted, this case will be very interesting to watch from this point in time.
One thing I would offer as a tip: we should begin to take notice of the distinct difference in the way this case will be reported from now on, and take that as advice to guide how we all publish comments online, regardless of the site we might be on.
Cheers
Out of interest, why will this case be any different to all the others gone before it?