Eh-hm.
FWIW, I do think that having differing perspectives and devil's advocate type positions in a rational dialog is good.
That said, sometimes it becomes clear that a dialog is not rational. Or that a dialog is not even what is going on.
'nuf said.
I posted a link to the transcripts from Dr Drew show (previous page) where it's concluded that the photos may have been about two consenting adults photographing themselves having sex:
TACO STEIN, SOLICITOR GENERAL OF ARUBA: I can admit the camera has been confiscated, and it`s looked at presently by the police to see what`s on it, and whether or not it has bearing on our investigation. While you`ll understand that I`m not in a position to comment upon what`s on the camera, what kinds of pictures those are, what I`ve heard about it is there`s no indication that there`s talk of duress in the pictures. But I can`t dwell upon what`s in the camera, what kind of pictures they are.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
DIMOND: Well, this indicates to me that she might have been a willing participant.
How does that confirm or change your current view on the case?
Here it is again