Taco Stein said he didn't see the photos himself. How would a photo really prove whether or not someone was willing, especially given the fact that she could have been drugged?
JR gave a graphic description in the press that all that was shown in some were "organs". How would they know she was a willing participant in those photos? Taco Stein didn't see the photos but a small time local press knows specifics details about the photos?
It's irresponsible for someone in authority to say she looked like a willing participant when they don't know if she was drugged in them.
JMHO
What we know is that GVG said that Robyn had taken a sleeping pill ... presumably that was the night before, perhaps as late as 2 AM (as that is when she posted "this sucks"). I would be surprised if Robyn took a sleeping pill in the morning. At this time, there is nothing to suggest that she was drugged during the photos. Photos of drugged people would be different than photos of awake, alert people. Taco Stein has said that she does not appear to be an unwilling participant ... and indeed, looking at some of her modeling shots ... she does seem to be promoting certain assets that may be popular in *advertiser censored* modeling.
It wasn't said that "all the photos show is organs". What has been said is that the photos were "beyond pornographic" and that they depicted "organs". They probably depicted more than just that, but that is the most shocking of the photo's content.
I think it can be rather obvious when looking at someone whether they are a willing participant or not ... it's usually quite evident in the expression in someone's eyes.