I want to clarify something because it appears I am defending Jeff Ashton's actions - Absolutely, that is not the case. It is difficult to excuse any married person joining a website using the marketing slogan "Life is short. Have an affair." (paraphrased)
HOWEVER, this is what is bothering me - admittedly, the Judge in Casey's trial, Belvin Perry, at one time had at least one affair while married. He wasn't pressured to resign. Bill Clinton / Monica Lewinsky - enough said. We all know we could list public officials ad nauseum here. Many of these type things are disclosed in public divorce records, divorce trial transcripts, etc...
SO, the difference re. those exposed here is that this isn't idle water cooler gossip or accusations made via docs filed by a angry spouse during acrimonious divorce - These hackers are criminals who are exposing people, listing their private emails addresses, home addresses, at least partial private credit card info, IP addresses, etc... The men they are exposing are NOT the only people they are hurting here. They are hurting their innocent children and spouses. Why should Jeff Ashton feel more pressure to resign that a sitting Judge or sitting President of the US? Because a hacker exposed him? Why should he suffer more? Why should he be forced to pay a bigger price? That is where I can't make the leap. Exactly what determines WHERE we are drawing the line?
For me, it if ain't my husband and it is not someone who could be blackmailed posing a risk to our national security, then I may feel disappointed but I'm not going to be screaming for their head to be put on the chopping block.