bessie
Verified Insider
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 31,771
- Reaction score
- 1,707
<rsbm>The story of who is on the list only matters, IMO, if the person is a self-righteous hypocrite like Josh Duggar.
Or if my husband's name is on there.
<rsbm>The story of who is on the list only matters, IMO, if the person is a self-righteous hypocrite like Josh Duggar.
hopes this unbelievable act of stupidity on my part does not take away from the good work that his department and he himself has done and will continue to do.
as embarrassed as he is he did not commit a crime.
As bad a judgment as this was it had nothing to do with the performance of his professional duties.
Does not recall how often in the year or so that he explored the site.
Does not feel comfortable discussing his family's reaction, that is private.
Bad personal judgment but again - no crime was involved.
When asked his thoughts on the hacking itself. Has no opinion. The presser is about what he himself did not what anyone else has done.
when asked why he did not come forward as soon as the hack happened rather than wait to be exposed. Would have spared family this knowledge if he could have.
His only hope is that the people of the 9th circuit will look at his body of work over the years.
When asked if this has been a humbling experience.
"It is humbling experience any time you have to stand before the public and admit to human frailty."
"The only person I owe answers to is at home right now with my kids"
why no affair "couldn't ultimately do that to my wife"
"I think I've humiliated myself enough for one weekend."
"Tomorrow morning I go back to work"
[paraphrased unless in quotes]
As a prosecutor, you learn that sometimes good people make bad decisions and he made a bad decisions.
Had account open for almost 2 years.
He said he was interested in looking at the site but he couldn't do anything because he would never hurt his wife. Basically saying he went to the site but couldn't act on it because of his wife.
Those defense attorneys are going to be all over this tomorrow . The murder trial he is prosecuting right now. Questioning each individual juror as to did they see this. Sorry folks but Jeff is history.
Does anybody have a link to what trial he is on that is on Websleuths?
He wanted to do his last salvo before he is fired tomorrow morning when normal business hours result in the state speaking of what their reaction is going to be.
I'm sure he has morals clause in his employment agreement. and this has tipped the morals clause to kick him out.
Such a sad ending to a great career.
:moo: