Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought with young children you could because of the development stages of teeth, and the way the bones fuse in the skull?
http://australianmuseum.net.au/how-do-we-know-an-individuals-age-at-death
http://www.seattlechildrens.org/medical-conditions/bone-joint-muscle-conditions/craniosynostosis/
I think the Milat blame happens not necessarily to point at Ivan, but at other family members who still live in the area. It's easily done because there are so many Milat siblings/family members & there have always been those who believe that Ivan didn't act alone (former Law Society President John Marsden was one of those people & there was reference to it in the judge's summing up at his trial as well) - & then there's the actions of his nephew in 2010. I live nearby & honestly, anytime something like this happens in an area associated with the Milat's the whispers start immediately - not about Ivan, but his brothers & nephews.
Edit : This link (courtesy of Ausgirl) discusses some of the family accomplice theories (not that I think this has anything to do with the Milats, it just helps explain why it's so easy to point the finger at them)
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/stalked-by-uncertainty/2005/07/20/1121539033488.html
I agree, it could definitely be the case since he was seen on two different dates. But why would he have the suitcase with him in town both times? If he wanted to move it closer to the road he wouldn't take it into town again, IMO.
I agree that this could be the work of a serial killer, especially if the killer was relatively unknown to Karlie (ie she met him during her travels).
I think too much emphasis is being placed on this "suitcase" man. That general area in SA is notorious for itinerant workers, as it is fruit picking season all year round. Apart from which, according to the eye witness accounts, the suitcase was a completely different colour. [/b ]If it was the case as has been suggested by some that he wanted to leave it somewhere to be found - why not leave it somewhere more obvious where it would be found straight away and not behind some bushes or wherever it was allegedly first placed, and phone the police anonymously? It would be good if he could be located to solve the mystery though.
Karlie & Khandalyce TIMELINE (so far)
1988
Karlie DOB
2006
Khandalyce DOB
2006 - 2008
Left Alice Springs to travel and work, no confirmed date, where were they that nobody is really sure?
November 8, 2008
Pulled over by police on Sturt Highway (Coober Pedy)
Seen by a friend and photographed in Marion Shopping Centre, Adelaide.
December 2008
Seen in the ACT at a shopping center (Unconfirmed)
September 4, 2009
Mother files missing persons report then withdraws it on September 10
August 2010
Karlie's remains found
July 15, 2015
Khandalyce's remains found
October 8, 2015
Call to CrimeStoppers identifying clothes
October 21, 2015
Karlie and Khandalyce identified as Belanglo & Wynarka Angels
SOURCES:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-21/timeline-karlie-jade-pearce-stevensons-mother/6874506
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-21/breakthrough-announced-in-wynarka-and-belanglo-cases/6872550
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-23/police-search-homes-in-sa-canberra-mother-daughter/6879814
Note: The details of their movements remain vague, especially when they are actually believed to have left Alice Springs and where they travelled.
If anyone can add to this that would be great, as the timeline still has some major holes in it....
( From Germany your English is now very good and I love your posts. You know you are an honoury Aussie now)
:grouphug::grouphug:
:grouphug::grouphug:
:blowkiss:
No ... Pulled over on Nov 8, in Adelaide in Nov, unsure of date .. Going back to edit.
Karlies mum had reported them missing on September, 4, 2009, and it is understood she withdrew the report on 9 October 2009 after she was reassured Karlie was safe and well, but did not want family contact at that time, he said.
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2015/10/21/girl-suitcase-was-daughter-woman-found-belanglo-forest
When Karlie's mother announced her missing, she was missing since 2008. I thought, Karlie then (2008) had left her home with her 2yo girl. Seemingly it was much earlier. OMG
2yo would have been young enough to have a child traveling with mum.
I'm thinking that pinpointing ages of children is much more difficult, there can be such enormous variations in size and body type at any given age.
I just can't get my head around this timeline. So the mother filed the missing person's report an entire nine months (approx.) after Karlie was killed? What on earth was going on during those months?
I truly can not see any likeness at all between either picture of Karlie and the facial reconstruction. None. I realise other people can, and I know it's not meant to be seen as a photograph. But the only thing I can see in terms of similarity is that they're both female. Everything else - eye shape, cheekbones, jaw shape, everything ... it's all off IMO.
It was all over the news when it was released - if anyone who knew her had seen anything in it that reminded them of Karlie they would have called in. That speaks for itself. But maybe nobody who knew her saw it? I find that hard to believe, tbh. It was very widely distributed.
Having said that, not many facial reconstructions from skeletons hit the mark (that I've seen anyway - I would love to see some examples that prove me wrong). So many things about a face - eyebrows, eyelid shape, lip structure etc, are what make our face distinctive. When those things have to be imagined of course it is going to be hard to get everything right.
Bella was not reconstructed from a skeleton.Little Bella ('baby doe') Bond from Boston. Her thread is in this forum - remarkably accurate reconstruction and another sad case of a child's life cut tragically short albeit in different circumstances to Khandalyce.