Ok, it's Australian Women's Weekly (I know, I know) but this is strange:
http://www.aww.com.au/latest-news/n...ht-with-funds-from-mothers-bank-account-22994
"Detectives have revealed that the suitcase that murdered toddler Khandalyce Pearce's body was found in was bought with funds from her mother’s bank account, after she was killed."
Do they mean after Khandalyce was killed? I ask because in the next but one paragraph they write "Hundreds of withdrawals and purchases were made between 2008 and 2012, however the one from the Mount Gambier luggage store was made just weeks before Karlie Pearce-Stevenson was allegedly killed in December 2008, The Australian reports."
Or is it just sloppy?
The article seems to contradict itself by saying:
“Detectives have revealed that the suitcase that murdered toddler Khandalyce Pearce's body was found in was bought with funds from her mother’s bank account, after she was killed.”
then
“…however the one from the Mount Gambier luggage store was made just weeks before Karlie Pearce-Stevenson was allegedly killed in December 2008.”
Unless there is another transaction about which we know nothing...?
BBM
PS: I am not aware of any official statement by police alluding to a purchase of luggage after Karlie's death.