hideoustroll
Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Messages
- 169
- Reaction score
- 6
I think her height sounds right for the upper percentile. Girls are generally bigger than boys until they reach puberty. Also, I have known a few little girls who are pretty big for their age, and they have all had larger dads. I just checked 95cm against me, and it isn't outside of the realms of impossibility. My youngest daughter was 90 cm at the same age, I just checked her blue book, whereas my son didn't reach that lofty height until he was 5 or so, as he was always small. He shot up in puberty though, and towers over her now.
I think they have no doubt determined her age through more scientific means, probably via various markers, and I doubt it is erroneous. They would have given an age range if they were unsure. They seem pretty positive of it.
Yes. The height of children can vary a LOT and their childhood height doesn't necessarily mean they will be a tall adult. My oldest daughter towered over all her peers from babyhood right through until she was eleven or twelve, people were always asking where she got her giant genes from. But she didn't grow to be a tall woman. Slightly on the short side actually.