That footage of Erin with her small bag was taken a number of weeks ago. It’s not from today.*she got to take her purse with her?…
Thanks Amalgam for the link to an article about these dogs. Apparently, these dogs can find hidden mobile phones, USBs, SIM cards and SD cards.I have never heard of technology detector dogs before, have you? What role do they play?
I guess when you are arrested you get taken into custody, so I would assume she is currently in police custody being questioned.I'm confused, wasn't she questioned a few months ago, then the press release that her lawyers screened beforehand? What is the difference between formal questioning and being questioned after you've been arrested?
Did Erin change her lawyer after the initial media release by her previous lawyers?I
I tend to agree, but it has been claimed in media coverage that Erin has engaged a top legal firm, well versed in homicide cases.
No, I don’t think she did.Did Erin change her lawyer after the initial media release by her previous lawyers?
As far as we know Erin was never formally questioned by LE.I'm confused, wasn't she questioned a few months ago, then the press release that her lawyers screened beforehand? What is the difference between formal questioning and being questioned after you've been arrested?
Erin's prominent criminal lawyer is Bill Doogue.No, I don’t think she did.
IMO
This is Bill Doogue's profile:Erin's prominent criminal lawyer is Bill Doogue.
I'm shocked, wasn't expecting any updates for a while. This is a huge update and no doubt will reignite my interest in the case. No charges laid as of yet, we shall see. IMO but an arrest wouldn't just happen over nothing.
I believe she did answer a few questions. For example, she lied and claimed that she had disposed of the dehydrator a long time before the lunch. I'm not sure how formal that initial questioning was.As far as we know Erin was never formally questioned by LE.
What happened was that she initially told LE “No comment” then on approximately August 13 or 14 released a statement to the media that was allegedly given to LE in order to set the record straight and so that people could better understand what happened in hopes of not thinking she was an “evil witch.”
The Deputy Police Commissioner was angry over the media link and made it clear the statement was not an official police statement.
Why her lawyers chose that strategy is puzzling since as noted above EP’s law firm representing her is supposedly a high powered firm.
So as far as we know Erin has never been formally questioned by LE in person, all that’s only been given LE was the written statement taken by her own lawyers.
Woman who cooked suspected poisoned meal details where she bought mushrooms
The woman who cooked a meal that is believed to have contained poisonous mushrooms and led to the deaths of three people gives a lengthy written statement to police detailing her account of what happened, and revealing she was hospitalised after the incident.www.abc.net.auDeputy police chief slams ‘unhelpful’ circulation of mushroom cook’s statement
Victoria Police say their lengthy investigation into the deaths of three people will include examining the veracity of Erin Patterson’s statement about the fatal lunch.www.theage.com.au
*she got to take her purse with her?…
I recall that Erin said she regretted taking the advice of her first lawyer/legal firm and stonewalling the police and media, but after seeking new representation she made the statement the media discussed.No, I don’t think she did.
IMO
That was my understanding too but I could not find a link to it.I recall that Erin said she regretted taking the advice of her first lawyer/legal firm and stonewalling the police and media, but after seeking new representation she made the statement the media discussed.