Indeed they have but she's a very obvious suspect - the only living and unharmed adult who was in the home at the time.
I wonder if they're going to be able to back up that idea with any evidence and have
Does anyone know how / why it's deadly mushrooms that have been fixated on in this case as opposed to some other form of poisoning or toxin?
I appreciate that 'the internet says' the deaths are in line with this particular mushroom but how was that suspicion arrived at so quickly? Would it not be the case that any type of severe deadly poison would result in chronic gastric issues and the liver failing?
sufficient grounds to charge her. I suspect not because my argument is that nobody can be sure where those people went before and after the meal and whether someone else poisoned them in a different manner than the very obvious one.
Even if she did this, I don't think they could get a conviction unless there's some proof / evidence over and above that 'they were poisoned'.