Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #15

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
https://relationshipscience.com/connections/neil-christian-fearis-p3712346 worked with CG. Was with CG on the night she went missing. Also worked previously in the law firm that EE was working for CCW, so it's likely EE was invited to attend functions with him after he moved to BDW
My mother in law's old work colleague at HWE used to work at CCW and remembers EE never attended a function without BRE.
BRE offered her a lift home, which isn't anything anyone would've considered unusual, that is until he was arrested and accused of being the CSK.

Now if BRE was looking for EE, who had just separated from, I presume he might've trolled her haunts and bumped into some of the same people he met at her work doos and social functions.

And thus people that they knew too.
He might've even befriended one beforehand and used him to "look for EE", but maybe that's what RZ thought, until he realised afterwards.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
 
Are we assuming the 'NOT RANDOM' part leads towards the 3-4 victims knowing each other?

Instead could the 'not random' part just indicate that the accused knew each of the 3-4 victims previously before allegedly committing the alleged crimes against them?

Is the connection through the accused rather than the girls?
 
https://relationshipscience.com/connections/neil-christian-fearis-p3712346 worked with CG. Was with CG on the night she went missing. Also worked previously in the law firm that EE was working for CCW, so it's likely EE was invited to attend functions with him after he moved to BDW
My mother in law's old work colleague at HWE used to work at CCW and remembers EE never attended a function without BRE.
BRE offered her a lift home, which isn't anything anyone would've considered unusual, that is until he was arrested and accused of being the CSK.

Now if BRE was looking for EE, who had just separated from, I presume he might've trolled her haunts and bumped into some of the same people he met at her work doos and social functions.

And thus people that they knew too.
He might've even befriended one beforehand and used him to "look for EE", but maybe that's what RZ thought, until he realised afterwards.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

There is a difference with being dropped home when other people know who is dropping you home. There are witnesses. When no one knows you are getting a lift from someone, there is an underlining risk if the driver can't be trusted IMO.
 
Maybe SS was the last blitz attack?
Or the first by lure?

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
 
Maybe SS was the last blitz attack?
Or the first by lure?

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

Hard to say.

No one around at that end of Claremont to see or hear a blitz.

IMO Maybe a lure to get SS in the car followed by a swift blow to the head and some rope to get her subdued.


............................................
Posts are purely my own opinion unless otherwise stated with source links. All my original text and images remain exclusively my personal copyright.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]
 
So we've hypothesised on ways the accused maybe met his 2 alleged victims JR and CG prior to the alleged crimes.

Even though the accused is not facing charges with the disappearance of SS, are we able to hypothetically discuss any connections between SS and BRE?


............................................
Posts are purely my own opinion unless otherwise stated with source links. All my original text and images remain exclusively my personal copyright.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]
 
If only we could get confirmation of the information given to police re SS sighting with tall, dark haired man. This could then connect accused to SS the next night when she disappeared. MOO
 
Both SS and JR went to the OBH before going to the Claremont Hotel. CG didn't go there on the night she was abducted but may have at other times. What's to say the girls weren't followed from OBH. Maybe there were some video cameras at OBH that showed patrons socialising. It would be interesting to know if there is a connection between the two establishments. MOO
 
Shirley Finn murder. Detective denies he did it. Ch 7 6pm news. In one minute.
 
Maybe SS was the last blitz attack?
Or the first by lure?

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

There was a lot of discussion in earlier threads about the Body Club which was where SS would have been walking when the car rolled up. It was burnt down later unrelated so doesn't show on current maps. The theory of someone coming from near the Body Club supporting the blitz theory. My feelings of late were that the girls voluntarily got into the car and at least with SS that it perhaps looked like a taxi.

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2007-07-11/man-charged-over-claremont-fire-in-2004/95970
 
Tis in the middle of a Coronal inquiry.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-29/shirley-finn-inquest-hears-from-former-police-officer/8852968

Not quite yet. The Perth Coroner's Court is conducting a hearing ahead of the inquest into Ms Finn's death, which is due to start next month.'

Former police officer James Boland told the hearing he was the second officer to attend the scene of the crime, at the Royal Perth Golf Course in South Perth, where Ms Finn's body was found slumped in her Dodge, with four bullet holes in her head. Mr Boland was questioned about information he had been given from a member of the public soon after Ms Finn's death — that Neddy Smith had murdered her.

Related:
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-0...-lover/8311826


http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-0...nquest/8500426

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-0...y-finn/7581076


 
fortuitous? Although some have said what amounts to targeted, unless the CSK left notes for the police, we might never really know.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

The CSK never sent the Police any notes. Nor was stuff from one victim left at another victim site. No need to ask re this.
 
There was a lot of discussion in earlier threads about the Body Club which was where SS would have been walking when the car rolled up. It was burnt down later unrelated so doesn't show on current maps. The theory of someone coming from near the Body Club supporting the blitz theory. My feelings of late were that the girls voluntarily got into the car and at least with SS that it perhaps looked like a taxi.

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2007-07-11/man-charged-over-claremont-fire-in-2004/95970

CG disappeared from the other side of the road and JR wasn't close to the location. I'd be interested in whether Australian Computer Resellers was a family business of the accused family and a convenient place to park.
 
The CSK never sent the Police any notes. Nor was stuff from one victim left at another victim site. No need to ask re this.

The accused was posting online, although most of the posts were b.s, some weren't and maybe the police should have been taking notes, IMO. Report from mainstream media on one of the accused alias he used on other blogs was posted on web sleuths and then taken down. JMO, as I saw the report but don't have a copy. Also, one or more others were posting that seemed to have some knowledge, IMO.
 
Yep I think boring as Bat S#.T BRE was commenting. But where? It was so long ago that he may have. But yes I think he was.
 
Shirley Flinn got Bowling balled due to the fact she was going to expose a lot of Coppers. Not many Coppers are going to look into this case. Not now,not then. :/
 
Yep I think boring as Bat S#.T BRE was commenting. But where? It was so long ago that he may have. But yes I think he was.

Interesting as I think he did drop a clue or two in those old blogs... and it wasn't just him, there were two separate people posting under one name in one of the blogs, IMO.

He was commenting on here as well. The Post printed an article naming the accused saying he had been posting three or four years on an online discussion about the CSK. Article not available online and all papers mention this were removed from circulation. This was under a different name than above. Although it didn't mention the alias, if mentioned the exact number of posts he made. Those posts (and in one other alias) only stopped not long before he was arrested. Again most bs. However maybe the cops were taking notes and he may have revealed a little too much, who knows? JMHO.
 
Just on Sarah Spiers, it seems incredibly likely that she got into the car that was seen pulling up near her, and not going through the green light as the car in front containing witnesses did. What ruse was used to get her in the car we may never know, but if she was desperate for a taxi and the car looked like one and she'd had a few drinks, it's not unplausible is it?

As for BRE posting on here and elsewhere, I'd bet money that he did, but obviously I have no evidence. @Innerchild, I'd be interested to hear more of what you know about this. I reckon I missed the report you're referring to.
 
Interesting as I think he did drop a clue or two in those old blogs... and it wasn't just him, there were two separate people posting under one name in one of the blogs, IMO.

He was commenting on here as well. The Post printed an article naming the accused saying he was been posting three or four years on an online discussion about the CSK. Article not available online and all papers mention this were removed from circulation. This was under a different name than above. Although it didn't mention the alias, if mentioned the exact number of posts he made. Those posts (and in one other alias) only stopped not long before he was arrested. Again most bs. However maybe the cops were taking notes and he may have revealed a little too much, who knows? JMHO.

Man what I would give to read those posts
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
2,165
Total visitors
2,251

Forum statistics

Threads
602,094
Messages
18,134,618
Members
231,231
Latest member
timbo1966
Back
Top