Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe due to their being absolutely no evidence whatsoever. In this case & I think most would agree, the the person who murdered JR & CG in all likelihood murdered SS.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
If that was the case why didn't they arrest the other POIs within the CSK case.
This is pretty much where my big question is: Is the reason they have charged BRE because they have something specific that has tied him to SS or are they just taking their chances given the apparent link (and him not being able to be ruled out of her disappearance)? And if it's the former, how significant is it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do all of the secure storage places require I.D?
- perhaps items which belonged to person x have recently been located.
- Perhaps those items were recently discovered by someone.
- Perhaps that someone was prompted to have a clean-up because the area was scheduled to have a curb side pick-up.
- Perhaps items were stored at a family members place and they stumbled across it/them - handing over to WAPOL.
Convictions have been made upon circumstantial evidence only. Snowy Rowles was convicted upon 2 murder changes by purely circumstantial evidence, and the 3rd by circumstantial and forensic evidence.Are forensics and/or a confession the only things recognised to lay a murder charge without a body? Can circumstantial evidence be used?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Try this link and search by name.
All 9 charges
http://ecourts.justice.wa.gov.au/eCourtsPortal/CourtListings/SearchForCourtListings
Convictions have been made upon circumstantial evidence only. Snowy Rowles was convicted upon 2 murder changes by purely circumstantial evidence, and the 3rd by circumstantial and forensic evidence.
Thankfully divining guilt by reading chicken entrails or if the subject survived being burnt at the stake, or provided a handy to confession during torture do not appear in modern civilian jurisprudence.
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
Or have they laid the charge because they cant find anything new and it is an effort to delay proceedings. In light of the new charges against the accused we request another 6 months to prepare the case.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Try this link and search by name.
All 9 charges
http://ecourts.justice.wa.gov.au/eCourtsPortal/CourtListings/SearchForCourtListings
9.15 am. Has the supreme court building stirling gardens, but doesn't say which court. Hope it hasn't been vacated like last time?
3 x Wilful murder
2 x [FONT=&]Aggravated Sexual Penetration without Consent.
1 x [/FONT]Deprivation of Liberty.
1 x Indecent assault
1 x Break and enter with intent
1 x Deprivation of liberty
Is that a sentencing hearing for Trudi Lenon and Jemma Lilley at 10.00 am at the District Court Building, Hay St, as well?
Maybe he talked. The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Try this link and search by name.
All 9 charges
http://ecourts.justice.wa.gov.au/eCourtsPortal/CourtListings/SearchForCourtListings
Question: the charges of 2x aggravated penetration sexual assault. Is that:
A: KK victim both charges
B: KK and HD victim
Or
C: another victim we haven't heard about.
IMU I thought HD victim did not suffer sexual penetration????
What am I missing?
9.15 am. Has the supreme court building stirling gardens, but doesn't say which court. Hope it hasn't been vacated like last time?
3 x Wilful murder
2 x [FONT=&]Aggravated Sexual Penetration without Consent.
1 x [/FONT]Deprivation of Liberty.
1 x Indecent assault
1 x Break and enter with intent
1 x Deprivation of liberty
Is that a sentencing hearing for Trudi Lenon and Jemma Lilley at 10.00 am at the District Court Building, Hay St, as well?