Whether the alleged CSK BRE is guilty or not or the CSK is someone else, which of the four options do you think pertains to the CSK, Spooky?
Do you think the CSK whoever it is just stopped after the 3 Claremont cases?
Do you think the accused BRE is guilty and he didnt stop till he was arrested (this question is probably subjudice)? If BRE is not the CSK do you think the CSK is dead, either killed himself, was himself murdered or died of accident, overdose or natural causes?
Or do you think whether the accused/alleged BRE is the CSK or its someone else, that they just burnt out and stopped.
Or do you think whoever it is kept going and moved to other areas and there are more cases attributable to him in other suburbs or country towns? And if so, which other cases do you think are attributable to the CSK?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry for delayed response......
If the accused is the actual CSK, and he did perhaps stop (allegedly) offending, I think possibly it due to a combination of:
1) having achieved some pre-determined (alleged) SK goal set by himself,
2) sustaining a physical injury preventing him from being physically capable of restraining and/or carrying (alleged future) victims,
3) he possibly found other interests/hobbies that satiated his alleged SK urges,
4) his life situation made it more difficult to find enough spare time to allegedly commit crimes without raising suspicion,
5) too many people in his house asking awkward questions, like 'where were you?' from his ex, or 'why do you do that Daddy?' from an enquiring child,
6) he was enjoying the infamy and observing the 'media and police reports' released to the public,
7) realising that Forensic Science was catching up on him and advances in Forensics was making apprehension and conviction of criminals more prevalent.
or
8) he just decided to stop! No reason necessary!
Just all speculation...........