Spinnaker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2017
- Messages
- 893
- Reaction score
- 449
I don't think we can assume whether the CSK did or did not use an exchange - we should really just focus on the facts, not personal opinion.It would depend on how much room is inside and if he was the “sole” technician rostered on to attend breakdowns in that vicinity. The Spectacles exchange is located within the south-eastern suburbs and close to home – possibly included within his after-hours jurisdiction.
As telephone exchanges are major infrastructure, and many households affected if they faulted, I’d think higher management would need to be notified of any critical breakdowns – they’d all have keys too – wouldn’t want management turning up.
Presumably the accused CSK had keys to many buildings and exchanges. Taking a victim to an exchange would require a certain degree of confidence and the risk of damages occurring, during a struggle - how would he explain damages to equipment – surely he wouldn’t risk it. JMO.
WAPOL searched/conducted forensics at the Cottesloe/ Stirling Highway exchange so they must have thought that there was a possibility that it may have been used by the alleged CSK (mentioned previously in WS).