Bartholemeus
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,498
- Reaction score
- 21
What compelling circumstantial evidence have sleuthers uncovered that provide possible "motives" for BRE being guilty of any or all of the crimes BRE has been charged with so far?
None. It's all based on DNA. LW was within a cat hair of being charged. Many in Macro were absolutely convinced and he was their #1 suspect until at least 2004. But they didn't charge him because they couldn't find the smoking gun and without that there wouldn't have been a conviction.
So based on DNA and the fact that they made an arrest and charged him causes most people to think SCS probably have their man and right now are busy building an air-tight Caporn-free case. They'll probably need more than DNA alone. I suspect SvD will attack the credibility of the DNA so right now Macro will be mapping out BE's whereabouts, alibis elc.