b4u
Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2016
- Messages
- 292
- Reaction score
- 12
Maybe further up the road someone saw her talking to a Holden Commodore but aren't sure what she was wearing or had inaccurate description of her so can't be confirmed sighting.
IMO, the lesson from this discussion,
is that just because someone goes public as being a witness,
and the Police let it be known that there were 3 witnesses to events leading up to CG's disappearance that night,
does not mean that there were no other witnesses to around that time and place that night.
Including witnesses who long ago or more recently came forwards to provide their recollection to WAPOL.
With WAPOL under no obligation to provide their witness evidence, except, to some degree, when it comes to a court case regarding CG.
Is the prosecution under any legal requirement to ensure that in a case like the one BRE is charged with regarding CG,
to bring all these witnesses to court?
Can the defence demand that the Prosecution and/or WAPOL provide it with information on every claimed witness to certain events.
Without the defence actually knowing who these claimed witnesses are, or whether there any claimed witnesses at all?
With the information including the last known contact details and other information that they can use to contact those witnesses to see if they can be used to assist in the defence case?
Someone with some appropriate legal knowledge help me out here please.