Have been interested to read theories dating back as far as 2007, that the CSK whoever he may be, was loosely modelling his crimes to identify with other notorious serial killers including two of Australias most notorious from Western Australia, Cooke and the Birnies. Also speculated links to the 1995 film 'Copycat."
Some possibIlities...
Zodiac Killer -'patterns " to locations , preoccupation with publicity about cases, contacting police and media with taunts/hints, terrorising population,well planned crimes
Cooke -location of crimes( Claremont/Nedlands, dates ,(Australia Day) male and female victims,differing methods of attack.
Bundy -biting of victims. Authority figure ruse to get victims into car .."Officer Roseland'....
Gein- KK Cemetery
Birnies- offering unsuspecting victims "rides" locations of abductions/ bodies.
Gacey - "Pogo " and "Patches " Clown persona, true nature masked by decorated Community work and involvement...... All JMO...
Something that keeps crossing my mind, is that lots of serial killers have been know to leave their victims in the same area. The Birnie's, as far as we know left theirs at the pine plantation. Ivan Milat left all his in the same state forest. According to the movie, the police were only looking for one couple at first and if it hadn't been for one young detective insisting they widen their search of the area the others would not have been found.
Do we know if the police have done a thorough search of the WHOLE areas around where JR and CG were found?
Could SS be nearby?
we'd all hope they searched thoroughly, but who knows?
on a basis that they didn't search thoroughly, and if a more extensive search was to be conducted dismissing all past speculated lineal type/discussed theories in which the CSK may have actually wanted his victims to be found
were the chosen Dsites -
1) totally random, trial & error; based more on his personal convenience en route to elsewhere? or
2) could the CSK's intention have originally been more of a planned cumulative site(?) as likened to the Birnies, Milat - and for further similar consideration - the MO of Worral&Miller in SA's Truro killings - in which instance the 7 young women abducted in quick succession over a short period of time, were all recovered in the same vicinity and within reasonably close proximity of each other, with very little effort made to conceal, other than being driven out of town to an isolated spot (...sounds familiar)
on the assumption SS was THE first of the claremont spree, and also on an assumption the CSK preferred his victims NOT to be found (further discount the other known Dsites of victims YET only speculated to be the work of CSK)... (are you still with me?) then close proximity to which of the JR/GC Dsites would be considered the more likely location to base any further search for SS?
Wellard or Pipidinny?
_______________
imo,
on the SerialKillers' "planned, cumulative site theory" theCSK's disposal of his second Claremont victim(JR) at Wellard, would be logical of this location as very likely having also been chosen for his first victim(SS)
then perhaps upon JR's discovery, he thought better of it and moved further afield when disposing of his third victim(CG)[emoji848]
it is also possible -if a "random/convenience/en route to elsewhere theory" in the disposal of (SS) were at Pipidinny, that JR's subsequent recovery at Wellard may have prompted a return to the undiscovered Pipidinny site for the disposal of (CG)[emoji848]
despite the passage of time, and as difficult as the effort would be, I believe the Wellard&Pipidinny sites are both worth further investigation ...but with the MO of other mentioned SKs in mind, Wellard is my choice of the two.
[emoji887]
