Innerchild - respectfully, you cant keep making claims about DNA being found at VC crime scene that matches DNA found on the kimono without backing that up with PROOF. If you have the original 1988 article or any subsequent articles claiming that DNA from an unknown person was found at VC crime scene which is now known to be the same DNA on the Kimono, alleged now to be BRE's, PLEASE post it.
The original 1988 article with the headline Kimono Clue to a Brutal Killing states "this kimono MAY be the clue that helps solve the brutal killing of VC..... It was dropped by a man that walked into a house in Huntingdale.....The kimono is the first good clue that police have been given in recent sex attacks in the area".
It has been well documented that the kimono was then put into storage for years and when retested recently, it was found to match DNA already in their database which matched KK rape & CG murder. They then relooked at the Huntingdale attack which led them to BRE. To my knowledge, NOWHERE has it ever been hinted at that BRE DNA was anywhere near VC crime scene. I am happy to be proved wrong & will wholeheartedly apologise to you, but until you have something stating that, or until new info is released that suggests his involvement in VC crime , you can not keep quoting it as fact.
The original 1988 article with the headline Kimono Clue to a Brutal Killing states "this kimono MAY be the clue that helps solve the brutal killing of VC..... It was dropped by a man that walked into a house in Huntingdale.....The kimono is the first good clue that police have been given in recent sex attacks in the area".
It has been well documented that the kimono was then put into storage for years and when retested recently, it was found to match DNA already in their database which matched KK rape & CG murder. They then relooked at the Huntingdale attack which led them to BRE. To my knowledge, NOWHERE has it ever been hinted at that BRE DNA was anywhere near VC crime scene. I am happy to be proved wrong & will wholeheartedly apologise to you, but until you have something stating that, or until new info is released that suggests his involvement in VC crime , you can not keep quoting it as fact.