Australia - Frances Crawford 49, found dead after suspicious lawn mower accident in Queensland.

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
He also saw himself as a bit of an ivory tickler... out in the bush, but then, Australians will play a piano anywhere.......urbanity at the end of the world....


I don't know how long they lived on that property. Have we seen it anywhere? Can't remember.

Maybe they made a "tree-change" once the children were older. Toowoomba is considered a city, by Aussie standards. And the property isn't too far from there. 20 min drive.

And less than an hour's drive (google says 55 mins) to Amberley Air Force base.

Google Maps
 
I don't know how long they lived on that property. Have we seen it anywhere? Can't remember.

Maybe they made a "tree-change" once the children were older. Toowoomba is considered a city, by Aussie standards. And the property isn't too far from there. 20 min drive.

And less than an hour's drive (google says 55 mins) to Amberley Air Force base.

Google Maps
Some bright spark could look back thru land titles..... :cool: It looks ideal for both their professions, really... .

I presume by now, Amberley Base has cut SQ .L. Crawford loose, to the tender mercies of those nice blokes at QLD POL... no doubt they have inspected all his telemetrics associated with the Base for any. ... um... 'discrepancies'..... people who are slack and dodgy in one area, are usually slack and dodgy in many areas...........He seems to be a man interested in his bank account, he may have dabbled in all sorts of nonsense that fed that account...
 
I don't know how long they lived on that property. Have we seen it anywhere? Can't remember.

Maybe they made a "tree-change" once the children were older. Toowoomba is considered a city, by Aussie standards. And the property isn't too far from there. 20 min drive.

And less than an hour's drive (google says 55 mins) to Amberley Air Force base.

Google Maps
The only reference I’ve found to how long they may have lived there is from Frances’ ABN listing. It shows May, 2016 for the postcode for Lockyer Valley.



 

Attachments

  • 1728603244138.jpeg
    1728603244138.jpeg
    78.5 KB · Views: 7
Update in the Courier Mail

Crawford, 46, has also been charged with misconduct with a corpse by interfering. His case was briefly mentioned without his appearance in Ipswich Magistrates Court on Friday.
 
Update in the Courier Mail

Crawford, 46, has also been charged with misconduct with a corpse by interfering. His case was briefly mentioned without his appearance in Ipswich Magistrates Court on Friday.
ooo that's a neat uppercut dished out by QLDPOL....often this charge is not laid down, ... soooo.. it's going to be a no holds barred event..!!!

He killed her, somewhere else than outside where her body was found.... then moved her to the embankment, and then wheeled the mower over to her.. or over her....
 
Hahaha ... I just looked at that 15 minutes ago, and he was not there. :)
I went over it twice, because it is pretty easy being in alpha order. As you say, they were probably late in updating the list.

I wonder if he will be represented by a high flier, or if he has not yet sourced a lawyer of his choice.
I checked the Law List a few times this morning too, just to make sure he was on it :-)

I'm interested to see who is legal representative is as well ... in my past life I was a long time employee in the Brisbane legal world & it's a very small world :-)
 
Update in the Courier Mail

Crawford, 46, has also been charged with misconduct with a corpse by interfering. His case was briefly mentioned without his appearance in Ipswich Magistrates Court on Friday.

I notice the Courier Mail article says that he was represented (for this 'appearance') by lawyer Andrew McGinness.
And that Andrew McGinness requested a minimum two-week adjournment.

The magistrate adjourned the mention until 25th October, and excused today's appearance.

 

This is the lawyer who represented him today .....​


Andrew McGinness - Accredited Criminal Law Specialist


In 2006 Andrew was awarded first place in the Inaugural Queensland Law Society Criminal Law Accreditation Course.

Andrew’s experience and reputation is such that he is consistently referred work from a number of top tier commercial based firms, other professional firms and individuals.

Andrew has over 40 years experience working in the area of criminal and quasi criminal (including traffic law) defence.
Andrew has experience representing clients charged with the full spectrum of criminal offences ranging from traffic matters through to murder.
Andrew is a well known and respected figure amongst his legal peers. He has presented many papers at Queensland Law Society Seminars and Continuing Legal Education conferences attended by other lawyers practising in criminal law.


 
The convoluted intricacies of murder.. .. you kill your wife to gain control of the shared property, and assets you then have to sell off the assets and property to pay for your defence at your trial for murder.


:pMake it make sense.
 
The convoluted intricacies of murder.. .. you kill your wife to gain control of the shared property, and assets you then have to sell off the assets and property to pay for your defence at your trial for murder.


:pMake it make sense.

It really ticks me off that he can use his deceased wife's assets (or portion thereof) to pay for his own defence for allegedly murdering her!!

Not to mention, their children's inheritance. They lose their mum, and her assets.

I wonder if QldPol can slap a restraint on the property, as was done in the case of the Greg Lynn trial in Vic.
 
I think we can dispense with the motor mower story at this point. The DPP in QLD has charged him with interfering with a corpse, and this implies, or infers ( for the pedants! ) that her body was relocated. It is possible to conjecture that she was not killed outside in the yard,,but her body taken outside after the murder. Or.. he killed her outside but not at the embankment, and nothing to do with the motor mower..

Anyway up, he interfered with her body after her death. People.. .. I ask you. What was going thru his tiny head?
 
It really ticks me off that he can use his deceased wife's assets (or portion thereof) to pay for his own defence for allegedly murdering her!!

Not to mention, their children's inheritance. They lose their mum, and her assets.

I wonder if QldPol can slap a restraint on the property, as was done in the case of the Greg Lynn trial in Vic.
You can put the family silver on McGinness tying up his fees, with adjustments for overruns , before donning his jabot and wig and taking on SQ/.L. Creepy' s case.. that would be the first cab off the rank in the McGinness Chambers....

unless the kids got in first and tied up the estate of their mother months back.. hopefully, they have, so Crawford is operating with only 1/2 the family estate....

Many a slip twixt cup and lip in these matters, though...
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
172
Total visitors
256

Forum statistics

Threads
609,331
Messages
18,252,774
Members
234,626
Latest member
XtraGuacPlz
Back
Top