Hi Dora.
I'm sorry you've had such personal experiences with suicide. And I honestly feel for you.
But as I said before, our personal experiences are not relevant to investigating this case objectively. Looking coolly at all angles requires a steady head, not one coloured by strong emotion IMO.
Also - I hear what you're saying about some families struggling to accept their loved one has suicided - but in this case it makes total sense that the parents would question it. The method of 'suicide' here is just SO bizarre and so unlike a female method IMO that I'd be screaming to anyone who would listen if it were my daughter who's life was lost in this way.
And in terms of the article you linked before, they are NOT referring to 'self-impalement' - which is what this suicide methodology is - when they were referring to knife use. They are referring to the slitting of throat or wrists - the common types of methods.
I actually feel this debate is a waste of time, as it brings nobody closer to finding justice for Jenny.
And that is what most of us are here for.
<modsnip>
Nowhere in that article on the Lethality of suicide methods does it say what you profess it means when they list "sharp object (- slitting of throat or wrists ) I would think "sharp object" would mean just that. However it seems to me that despite explaining it several times you have not yet been able to grasp the point of my putting up those stats. The point is that many here have stated they do not believe she would have chosen that method of suicide because of its uncertainty in being successful especially given that she had access to pill she could have used which seemed to have been deemed by some here as being a more successful method. The commonality of any method is irrelevant to the argument here - what I am talking about is the effectiveness of a method because it has been stated here by others that pills would have been a more effective method. This is simply not true as 85% of all failed suicide attempts lie with the use of pills/poison. Besides you have not thought out your argument very well and make a contradictory statement when you assert that the report is talking about slitting of throat or wrists when it refers to "sharp objects" by adding that such are the common types of methods which they are not according to the report which clearly shows sharp objects being used in only 1.84% of all successful suicides