GUILTY Australia - Jill Meagher, 29, Melbourne, 22 Sep 2012 #5

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it o.k to say that from Elsa Corps FB page says that no there is nowhere to add your name to the petition... However they may work on something (website/blog) to make that possible since the rally last night.
 
Corrective Services NSW Commissioner Peter Severin said the 29-year-old's weekend leave was recommended by the independent Serious Offenders Review Council and also the State Parole Authority.

A total of 14 males took part in the attacks.

Brothers Bilal Skaf and Mohammed Skaf were among the convicted rapists and led the attacks.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/br...ed-weekend-leave/story-e6frf7kf-1226567433933


Welcome to suburban Australia- vastly different from the glossy brochures of koalas, kangaroos, and world-class coastlines.
 
SouthAussie said:
These charges relate to crimes committed over 12 years ago! It looks like VicPol are looking through all relevant unsolved crimes ... and maybe have received some tips. Good. If found guilty, surely serious consecutive sentences would mean this dangerous sicko will be put away permanently!
Click to expand...

Or they're going through DNA samples of in solved crimes....
 
"So, for the moment I'm prepared to stay away from that more costly and draconian exercise of CCTV.

"But I've said that in a year's time if it's not working then we'll have to put CCTVs in there."
http://www.news.com.au/national/lor...or-city-laneways/story-fndo4cq1-1226567020405

I find it remarkable that Doyle believes CCTV is “draconian”, when it strikes me as Luddite and therefore draconian not to have CCTV. Seriously, is this guy delusional? I think we all know where the truth lies when we saw the word 'costly'.

So, that&#8217;s ok ladies, only one more year of Russian roulette left, until the &#8220;draconian&#8221; measures take place- unless of course the council suffers one of those all-too-frequent budget shortages, in which case the new CCTV&#8217;s could be 5 years off. <modsnip>I HATE politicians! <modsnip>
<modsnip>
 
JGow said:
I don't understand this:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...d-woman-arrested/story-fncynkc6-1226567524199

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/7...h-rape-at-shopping-centre-20130203-2ds3y.html

Why is he on bail? I'm surprised since he is charged with rape, and when I first heard this story in the news all I got from it was that he indecently hugged her, not rape. There's so much we are not being told.
Click to expand...

Maybe they're charging him with rape as a strategy to extract some confession from him as to what really happened, because he's denying involvement or playing it down- so they're playing it up, and they'll meet somewhere in the middle.
 
I'd say they're charging him because he's matched up and they have iron clad case ... They want him off the streets permanently and are making sure it happens this time.
 
ONE of the men jailed for the series of horrific gang rapes in southwestern Sydney was set to be released to a caravan park on the state's south coast today with only his brother as a supervisor.

A Corrections NSW source said none of the specialist community compliance officers had been rostered on to check on his welfare during the caravan park visit.

"It's hard to believe that no one would check on him besides his own brother, but that's what was going to happen," the source said.

Howard Brown, from the Victims of Crime Advocacy League, said the person who approved the day release "should be sacked".

"This is like releasing a kid into the lolly shop without any supervision," Mr Brown said. "It's a silly decision for the community there and also for the offender.

"His brother as a supervisor is completely inappropriate. It's not in his interest to report anything that happens. It's just a disgraceful decision."

Shadow attorney-general Paul Lynch said he too was shocked at the decision.

<modsnip>

"If the justice system is to work you must have proper supervision of offenders. The O'Farrell government doesn't understand this."
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...-rapists-day-out/story-fndo28a5-1226567398382

<modsnip>
 
Mrs G Norris said:
I'd say they're charging him because he's matched up and they have iron clad case ... They want him off the streets permanently and are making sure it happens this time.
Click to expand...

It depends on the definition of rape. Does rape include what is called 'digital rape'? Maybe that is what they're meaning by rape. I fail to see how he raped in the commonly thought of way, if it was just a hug. If they mean digital rape, then the charge is not a tactic by the police.
 
JGow said:
I don't understand this:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...d-woman-arrested/story-fncynkc6-1226567524199

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/7...h-rape-at-shopping-centre-20130203-2ds3y.html

Why is he on bail? I'm surprised since he is charged with rape, and when I first heard this story in the news all I got from it was that he indecently hugged her, not rape. There's so much we are not being told.
Click to expand...

It does say he hugged her and then sexually assaulted her, so I guess it depends what it means by "sexually assaulted". Seems pretty brazen behaviour in such a public place, so definitely concerned about how far he would go without an audience...or maybe that was the point!
 
Paulie11 said:
It depends on the definition of rape. Does rape include what is called 'digital rape'? Maybe that is what they're meaning by rape. I fail to see how he raped in the commonly thought of way, if it was just a hug. If they mean digital rape, then the charge is not a tactic by the police.
Click to expand...

I was talking about AB's new charges I didn't realize we'd veered off onto another case when I made that comment.
 
He should not be on bail for a serious assault of that nature, that was my point!
 
We show far too much softness towards people who seriously harm other people &#8230; they have seriously hurt an innocent person &#8230; why on earth do we just say &#8216;Okay, now you hang around out there on bail, try not to hurt anyone else till we have time to get to your case&#8217; &#8230;. or perhaps worse still &#8216;You&#8217;ve done this 82 times now, we&#8217;ve put you through the programs, you need to be good while on parole this time&#8217; ??

Is there still some lingering archaic doubt in the court's eyes about the seriousness and violence of sexual assault?
 
SouthAussie said:
We show far too much softness towards people who seriously harm other people … they have seriously hurt an innocent person … why on earth do we just say ‘Okay, now you hang around out there on bail, try not to hurt anyone else till we have time to get to your case’ …. or perhaps worse still ‘You’ve done this 82 times now, we’ve put you through the programs, you need to be good while on parole this time’ ??

Is there still some lingering archaic doubt in the court's eyes about the seriousness and violence of sexual assault?
Click to expand...

Not to mention the fact that, in most cases, they can't help but re-offend!
 
JURIES will recommend what sentences criminals get for serious crimes if Labor wins the next state election.

Under the plan, to be tried if Daniel Andrews becomes premier in 2014, County and Supreme Court judges would be required to consult jurors and listen to their views before passing sentence.

Like judges, jurors would see the victim impact statements and pre-sentence reports, and hear submissions from counsel.

They would then be asked to recommend a minimum non-parole period.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/la...under-labor-plan/story-fnat79vb-1226567751721

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/more-power-to-the-people/story-e6frfhqo-1226567670045

This all sounds good, but I doubt this will make a real impact on crime. It sounds to me this is more cosmetic than anything else- just to give the people a sense of control over what they will in reality have zero control over, just as they do now.
 
http://www.heraldsun.com.au
Victorian Government to Toughen Parole System after &#8216;failure'
Matt Johnston From: Herald Sun February 05, 2013 4:04PM
Premier Ted Baillieu said: "Parole is a privilege, not a right, and community safety has to be the priority," he said. "Victorians have a right to go about their daily lives without facing threats from people who are already known to be dangerous. These changes give effect to that proposition."
Minister for Corrections Andrew McIntosh said the laws would bring parole practices in line with what Victorians want.
 
Some further quotes from the above-mentioned article:
"It is appropriate that it does apply to charges and not just convictions, as these offenders are still serving sentences when on parole, they are not free in society but are still serving a sentence," Ms Betts said.
But Ms Betts said the government needed to set minimum time-frames parolees would go before the board once they charged with another offence.
She added information on how violent and sexual offenders behaved in society needed to put before the parole board.
"These are not ordinary people and we need to assess them in that context. We need to remember that some offenders get gratification from their crimes."
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/la...le-after-failure/story-fnat79vb-1226570761330

It is very important to note that not all charges turn into convictions, yet we must remember what charges were brought, because they were brought by police, detectives who always knew more than was admitted into court; and narrowly remembering, or admitting, only convictions, does a great disservice to &#8216;context&#8217;, which is referenced in the latter part of the quotes:
"These are not ordinary people and we need to assess them in that context. We need to remember that some offenders get gratification from their crimes."
 
Fuskier said:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au
Victorian Government to Toughen Parole System after ‘failure'
Matt Johnston From: Herald Sun February 05, 2013 4:04PM
Premier Ted Baillieu said: "Parole is a privilege, not a right, and community safety has to be the priority," he said. "Victorians have a right to go about their daily lives without facing threats from people who are already known to be dangerous. These changes give effect to that proposition."
Minister for Corrections Andrew McIntosh said the laws would bring parole practices in line with what Victorians want.
Click to expand...

Yes, but then the civil libertarians come in with "He's done the time" type of bull s... Rehabilitation is such a joke! Legal and Prison systems Australia-wide need to look at the research of re-offenders and the type of crimes, and work out just who CANNOT be rehabilitated. Then stop spending money on these lost causes! Do these people get a kick out of their crimes, or do they just want to return to the routine of prison? Maybe a bit of both.

Whatever happened to castration? Not that it would stop murder. Maybe, just maybe, the death penalty is the only option. When AB attempted suicide, why not just let him go? Isn't that HIS right?

Sorry, I've caught the ranting bug. It is just so outrageous!
 
http://www.heraldsun.com.au
Parole violaters to go straight back to jail under new legislation
James Campbell From: Herald Sun February 06, 2013 12:00AM
SEX offenders and violent criminals convicted of further sex or violence offences while on parole will be automatically returned to prison, under legislation to be introduced into State Parliament today.
The Government will also announce today that former Victoria Police deputy commissioner Kieran Walshe is to be appointed to the parole board, following calls by Victoria Police, and members of the public, for the appointment of a serving police officer.
 
I would have been mad as hell if AB succeeded in his suicide attempt.
I would not have cared less if he decided to end his life before the world got to know Jill's name.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 155 more.
Total: 401 (members: 156, guests: 245)

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
245
Total visitors
401
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
606,811
Messages
18,211,546
Members
233,968
Latest member
Bill1620
Back
Top