SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,855
- Reaction score
- 182,284
I don’t see it this way
I see it that he was asked to be an unwilling babysitter while mum neglected her / scored .
He didn’t think that was good so tried to knock her out ( after all someone gave him heroin at 12!) or do drugs w her ( a kinda up yours to the caring grandparents that he disliked )
Realised she was dead
Took her outside n shot her thinking he could claim he thought it was a fox etc . Didn’t work . Shot her in the face then thought oh no how do I explain that ?
Tells his mum it was KM
She believes him n tried to cover up
KM suspects it’s him but cos she wants to cling to the love interest doesn’t raise alarm that he has a gun
They are both guilty of destroying that little girl in my opinion
The forensic pathologist thinks that Charlise was still alive when she was shot in the back. Because she had hemorrhaged. People who are shot/stabbed/sustain a wound will hemorrhage if their heart is still pumping blood throughout their body.
Charlise was shot from behind in the pelvis area and again in the face under the right cheek bone, from “right to left, front to back, and upwards”, according to part of an autopsy report read to the jury.
Hemorrhaging suggested she was still alive when she suffered the gunshot to her back, the court was told.
![www.theguardian.com](/forums/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.guim.co.uk%2Fimg%2Fmedia%2F98c69782be9a60a54115b43ec3c844c8c6fde46d%2F0_124_3000_1800%2Fmaster%2F3000.jpg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D630%26quality%3D85%26auto%3Dformat%26fit%3Dcrop%26overlay-align%3Dbottom%252Cleft%26overlay-width%3D100p%26overlay-base64%3DL2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc%26enable%3Dupscale%26s%3Dc9af982b9671274735069029a5827fa1&hash=339b2170ad909b10a397e6f4932b65ca&return_error=1)
Charlise Mutten likely still alive when she was shot in back and head, murder trial hears
Court also hears nine-year-old had traces of anti-psychotic drug in her system when she died
Last edited: