Found Deceased Australia - Karen Ristevski, 47, Melbourne, Vic, 29 June 2016 - #17 *Arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Morrisa said:
Borce Ristevski's tenants not told by real estate agents the property was suspected murder scene | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...

I smell a law suit.

In 2004 the Sydney home in which Sef Gonzales murdered his family was sold to some buyers who were unaware of its tragic past. Once they found out about the home’s history, they didn’t want to proceed with the purchase. This prompted a review of the NSW laws surrounding disclosure. The agent had to refund their deposit, and the home was later sold for less than the original price.

The law changed as a result of that review and real estate agents must now disclose any ‘material fact’ before they can sell a property. But what actually constitutes a material fact isn’t always clear.

Selling a house with history - realestate.com.au
 
BR knows he’s going down & he’s sitting counting the days that will be deducted.

It was all about greed and now he hasn’t got a worry in the world when we, the great unwashed, are paying for his food and accommodation.

What’s our justice? Knowing that murderers are behind bars, that’s our justice and worth every hard earned cent.
 
tmar said:
Ages ago, BR had stated on the afternoon, of Karen's disappearance, he tried to be active with Uber, to have fares, but App ? didn't work/? we thought Uber would have such details, if ? fares/? attempts etc.
Now if your wife 'went for a walk' after an argument, would you leave, and try for Uber fares!!!!o_Oo_Oo_O
Click to expand...
He didn't think this one through, along with all of the other absurd attempts to create an alibi. By this time, he supposedly knew Karen was missing, she didn't attend her workplace, both cars were at home, and he "went Uber driving". So according to his version of events, his car was behind Karen's when she had walked out 'through the garage' in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head', he swapped them around so he could take her car to get quotes at 2 garages to fix the fuel gauge and/or fill it with petrol which he decided later that he hadn't actually done. He subsequently remembered he actually took her car for a drive to fix the fuel gauge, missed a few turn offs as would be expected :rolleyes: (sounds like Pinocchio's driving record), and low and behold, wait for it, drum roll please, it was fixed, all by itself :D It seems luck was on his side. But suddenly his phone either went flat or he turned it off so he couldn't share this great news with Karen. Funnily enough, Karen's phone appeared to be also in the car. So it seems Karen, a self-employed business woman, expected at work in several hrs, after a 'fight with her husband about finances', had walked out through the garage in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head' without her mobile phone. So he drove home, didn't miss any turn offs, and organised a replacement staff at Bella Bleu in place of Karen. Then he swapped the cars around and went to do some Ubering, and even though his phone was now back on, he couldn't get the app to work. Luckily for him, Karen had bleached the ensuite shower and left her rings behind before she left which he felt was a priority and important to advise the Police straight up. :cool:
 
Edgarb said:
He didn't think this one through, along with all of the other absurd attempts to create an alibi. By this time, he supposedly knew Karen was missing, she didn't attend her workplace, both cars were at home, and he "went Uber driving". So according to his version of events, his car was behind Karen's when she had walked out 'through the garage' in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head', he swapped them around so he could take her car to get quotes at 2 garages to fix the fuel gauge and/or fill it with petrol which he decided later that he hadn't actually done. He subsequently remembered he actually took her car for a drive to fix the fuel gauge, missed a few turn offs as would be expected :rolleyes: (sounds like Pinocchio's driving record), and low and behold, wait for it, drum roll please, it was fixed, all by itself :D It seems luck was on his side. But suddenly his phone either went flat or he turned it off so he couldn't share this great news with Karen. Funnily enough, Karen's phone appeared to be also in the car. So it seems Karen, a self-employed business woman, expected at work in several hrs, after a 'fight with her husband about finances', had walked out through the garage in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head' without her mobile phone. So he drove home, didn't miss any turn offs, and organised a replacement staff at Bella Bleu in place of Karen. Then he swapped the cars around and went to do some Ubering, and even though his phone was now back on, he couldn't get the app to work. Luckily for him, Karen had bleached the ensuite shower and left her rings behind before she left which he felt was a priority and important to advise the Police straight up. :cool:
Click to expand...

Out of respect for Karen, I hope the jurors don't burst out laughing when they hear that comical litany of lies.
 
Edgarb said:
He didn't think this one through, along with all of the other absurd attempts to create an alibi. By this time, he supposedly knew Karen was missing, she didn't attend her workplace, both cars were at home, and he "went Uber driving". So according to his version of events, his car was behind Karen's when she had walked out 'through the garage' in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head', he swapped them around so he could take her car to get quotes at 2 garages to fix the fuel gauge and/or fill it with petrol which he decided later that he hadn't actually done. He subsequently remembered he actually took her car for a drive to fix the fuel gauge, missed a few turn offs as would be expected :rolleyes: (sounds like Pinocchio's driving record), and low and behold, wait for it, drum roll please, it was fixed, all by itself :D It seems luck was on his side. But suddenly his phone either went flat or he turned it off so he couldn't share this great news with Karen. Funnily enough, Karen's phone appeared to be also in the car. So it seems Karen, a self-employed business woman, expected at work in several hrs, after a 'fight with her husband about finances', had walked out through the garage in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head' without her mobile phone. So he drove home, didn't miss any turn offs, and organised a replacement staff at Bella Bleu in place of Karen. Then he swapped the cars around and went to do some Ubering, and even though his phone was now back on, he couldn't get the app to work. Luckily for him, Karen had bleached the ensuite shower and left her rings behind before she left which he felt was a priority and important to advise the Police straight up. :cool:
Click to expand...

Good post Edgarb.
What you said ‘Karen's when she had walked out 'through the garage' in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head'.
IMO the only reason a woman would do this is to escape something.

I doubt he planned this because there are too many stupid mistakes.
It could be there was animosity building, a fight, revenge, hatred, anyway BR won the argument.

He could have filled her vehicle with petrol, put a hose in a window, closed the garage and went Ubering for the day.
 
they'll get you said:
Good post Edgarb.
What you said ‘Karen's when she had walked out 'through the garage' in winter with no socks or shoes on to 'clear her head'.
IMO the only reason a woman would do this is to escape something.

I doubt he planned this because there are too many stupid mistakes.
It could be there was animosity building, a fight, revenge, hatred, anyway BR won the argument.

He could have filled her vehicle with petrol, put a hose in a window, closed the garage and went Ubering for the day.
Click to expand...
Thanks TGU

What's the saying, "Won the battle but LOST the war..."

If only he decided to walk away from an upstanding woman like Karen, but instead he decided he had every right to "win" the battle and take his wife's life . He chose not only to forgot about the WAR he would have to face as a consequence of his actions, which the odds are he will lose, but he continued to carry it on with a distinct lack of intellect and relied solely on very poor attempts at deception. The Police were suspicious by day 4 at the very latest it appears.

Too true, "They'll Get You"!

IMO
 
ThaiBali said:
It's never been said Karen liked walking or she had a fitbit. Source please
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure they weren't saying that Karen wore a fitbit, rather, that in light of the events in the article it was hoped (or wishful thinking) that she did in order for police to have evidence of her movements at the time of her disappearance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 120 more.
Total: 2,878 (members: 121, guests: 2,757)

Online statistics

Members online
121
Guests online
2,757
Total visitors
2,878
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
599,927
Messages
18,101,734
Members
230,956
Latest member
Bloocheez
Back
Top